Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Meenaba Divyavirsinhji Alias Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Meenaba Divyavirsinhji Alias Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Meritorious Appeal Should Not Be Rejected on Limitation Alone — ITAT Ahmedabad Restores Matter with Costs The Ahmedabad Bench of the ITAT set aside the order of the CIT(A)/NFAC for AY 2019-20, holding that a meritorious appeal involving substantial additions cannot be dismissed solely on the ground of delay without adjudicating the issues on merits. Key findings of the Tribunal: CIT(A) erred in dismissing appeal in limine: The CIT(A) rejected the assessee’s appeal for 87-day delay without examining the grounds on merits. The Tribunal h...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930