Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kalpesh Ravjibhai Sojitra Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Kalpesh Ravjibhai Sojitra Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) JAO Cannot Issue Reassessment Notices After Faceless Scheme — ITAT Rajkot Quashes Entire Reassessment The Rajkot Bench of the ITAT quashed the reassessment proceedings for AY 2017-18, holding that the notices issued under sections 148A(b), 148A(d) and 148 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) were void ab initio, as they were not issued through the mandatory faceless mechanism prescribed under section 151A read with section 144B and the Faceless Reassessment Scheme, 2022. Key findings of the Tribunal: Faceless regime is mandatory: Once ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031