Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : A.T. Invofin India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
A.T. Invofin India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Reopening Beyond Four Years Without Alleging Assessee’s Failure Is Invalid: Delhi ITAT Quashes 148 Notice in Penny-Stock Case Assessee, a NBFC managing investments & securities transactions, filed return declaring loss of Rs.2.98 crore. Assessment u/s 143(3) was completed on 25.03.2016. After lapse of four years, AO issued notice u/s 148 on 30.03.2021 based on Investigation Wing alleging fictitious losses in transactions of Stampede Capital Ltd. & Atlanta Infra & Finance Ltd. AO stated that assessee failed to disclose fully ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930