The Tribunal held that reopening based on Section 50C was unsustainable because the provision applies only to sellers, not purchasers of property. With the very foundation of reassessment failing, the addition based on circle-rate difference was deleted. The ruling underscores that incorrect legal assumptions cannot justify reopening under Section 147.
Delhi High Court held that the mark ‘SoEasy’ for Hindi language learning is suggestive in nature and it is settled law that suggestive Trade Marks are liable to be protected under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Accordingly, appeal is allowed and order is set aside.
The Tribunal deleted the Section 68 addition after finding no material linking the assessee to any accommodation-entry scheme. All documentary evidence—demat records, broker notes, and banking channels—supported genuine share transactions. The ruling reiterates that suspicion or probability cannot override verified evidence.
Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to the person accused in matter of bogus firms and passing of fraudulent Input Tax Credit under GST since claims are yet to be proved and accused has been in prolonged custody.
NCLT Mumbai held that resolution plan of Unijules Life Sciences Limited [Corporate Debtor] as submitted by S.S. Fabricators & Manufacturers P. Ltd. [Successful Resolution Applicant] approved since it is duly approved by CoC and also meets requirement of Section 30(2) of the IBC.
The ITAT held that cash deposits during demonetisation could not be taxed u/s 68 when all sales were recorded, verified, and supported by stock and VAT records. Since books were audited, accepted, and showed no defect, the addition of ₹12.20 crore based on mere averages was unsustainable. The ruling confirms that documented cash sales cannot be taxed again as unexplained cash credit.
Explains why ITC reversal is still mandatory when capital goods are exported and clarifies how Section 18(6) operates despite zero-rating benefits.
Explains the updated reporting structure for ITC reclaimed in FY 2025–26, clarifying which tables apply for Rule 37/37A and other reversals.
Explains how recent judicial interpretations under the Code have strengthened creditor rights by upholding independent and co-extensive guarantor liability.
Explains how courts held that even interest-free debentures may qualify as financial debt if they show the commercial effect of borrowing, allowing Section 7 applications by trustees.
