Madras High Court permitted Tuskers Associates to file a late GST appeal with a 15% pre-deposit, challenging a demand over non-reflection of credit notes and ITC reversal in GSTR-2A.
The Allahabad High Court ruled that excess stock found during GST checks should be handled under Sections 73/74, not Section 130 confiscation, citing the Dinesh Kumar Pradeep Kumar precedent.
The Allahabad High Court has dismissed Abhishek Pathak’s plea for transit anticipatory bail in a GST inquiry, citing the need for exceptional circumstances and the applicant’s absence.
The ITAT Surat deleted a Section 271-I penalty against Gopal Chandak for non-filing of Form 15CA on non-taxable remittances, citing that rules were notified late.
CESTAT Chennai rules for PGC Corporation Limited; finding no misdeclaration on reimported goods despite label error, citing unchanged composition and drawback return.
ITAT Pune quashes Section 271(1)(c) penalty on Intervalve Poonawalla for leave encashment disallowance, citing full disclosure and judicial precedents.
The ITAT Delhi partially allowed the Revenue’s appeal against Rai Bahadur Narain Singh Sugar Mills Ltd, making a lump-sum addition of ₹5 lakh for unexplained cash deposits during demonetization.
The ITAT Delhi has directed the NFAC to apply the peak credit theory and allow set-off against agricultural income for unexplained cash deposits in the reassessment of Shakti Singh.
Kerala High Court rules in favor of Bhima Jewels, stating limitation period under KVAT Act applies to Section 25A proceedings, citing Joy Alukkas precedent.
The Allahabad High Court quashed a GST demand order against Unique Computer & Communication Shop for exceeding the show cause notice amount, citing a violation of Section 75(7) and lack of proper hearing.
