Are time-limits in Regulation 17 of Custom Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 mandatory? Explore judicial precedents and procedural guidelines here.
ITAT Rajkot reviews the PCIT’s revision under Section 263 regarding income classification in Jayshree Sarees case.
ITAT Rajkot allowed appeals by Saurashtra Cement on guest house maintenance costs for AY 2014-15 and 2015-16, overturning prior disallowances.
Atlantic Shipping Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) In a recent ruling by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Rajkot, the case of Atlantic Shipping Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer has brought to light critical issues regarding tax assessments for shipping companies operating in international waters and the applicability of the India-Singapore Double […]
The Commissioner holding that the appellant had resorted to deliberate misdeclaration and utilised the carnet documents to clear the vehicle without payment of duty, held that the car was liable for confiscation u/s. 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962.
A Disciplinary Committee has closed a case against a Chartered Accountant, finding him not guilty of professional misconduct related to the delayed submission of an audit report.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that the addition under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act made without proper examination of the books of account and relevant financial records unjustified. Accordingly, order set aside and matter restored back.
CESTAT Hyderabad held that imposition of penalty on allegation of foreign origin gold set aside as department failed to examine the documents nor have given any specific findings on the defence of the assessee. Thus, order set aside and matter remanded back.
ITAT Mumbai held that depreciation under section 32 of the Income Tax Act on the right to collect toll on the roads developed on BOT basis is not eligible.
The Tribunal reiterated that the PCIT cannot expand the scope of assessment beyond the reasons recorded by the AO during the reassessment process. Thus, any claims regarding non-verification of the other issues raised by the PCIT could not justify overturning the AO’s assessment.
