ITAT Kolkata held that AO failed to examine the agreement as composite agreement and hence non-examination of AO with that angle has caused prejudice to the interest of Revenue and hence CIT rightly set aside the assessment order by exercising powers under section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that addition based on incriminating material found during the search carried out of ‘some other person’ i.e. third person/ party and assessing the same by invoking provision of section 147 instead of section 153C is unsustainable.
Durga Trading Company & Anr. Vs Deputy Director of Income Tax & Ors. (Calcutta High Court) Introduction: In the case of Durga Trading Company & Anr. v. Deputy Director of Income Tax & Ors., the Calcutta High Court examined the validity of an income tax assessment order, focusing on the violation of natural justice. This […]
Punjab and Haryana High Court Upheld order of Assistant Excise and Taxation Officer’s order, citing mala fide intent to evade taxes in Bright Road Logistics v. State of Haryana.
Read about the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s verdict in the case of M/s Parsvnath Traders v. Principal Commissioner, CGST, which ruled that deposited GST amounts collected during search proceedings should be refunded along with interest.
Allahabad High Court quashes Section 263 order and imposes cost of Rs 10,000 on PCIT for lack of proper opportunity. Analysis of the judgment in M.L. Chains Vs PCIT case.
ITAT Mumbai remanded the matter back to the file of Assessing Officer as incriminating document found against the Assessee during search operation of third party is not provided to the Assessee.
CESTAT Delhi held that service tax is not chargeable on the services provided in respect of tour undertaken for carrying out Hajj pilgrimage in Saudi Arabia by Indian pilgrims considering these as export of service.
ITAT Chennai held that in absence of incriminating material as a result of search, no addition can be made in the assessment framed u/s.143(3) r.w.s.153A of the Act, if such assessments are unabated on the date of search.
NFRA Penalized Auditors of Tanglin Developments Ltd for Lapses in Professional Judgment, Unreported Irregularities and Tampering with the Audit File
