Explore the definition and scope of related party transactions, along with recent amendments in the LODR, 2015. Gain insights into the approval and review mechanisms, exemptions, and materiality thresholds for these transactions.
ITAT Mumbai held that order passed without considering the documents and without examining the correct residential status of the assessee is liable to be restore back for de novo adjudication.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that that appellants are eligible for benefit of Notification No. 67/95 and the duty demand on the quantity of oxygen so used in the manufacture of sulphuric acid, is liable to be set aside.
Stay informed about the latest changes in SEBI’s Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements with our note on the Second Amendment Regulations, 2023. Effective from June 14, 2023, these amendments cover crucial aspects like compliance officers, director appointments, cybersecurity, disclosure thresholds, shareholder rights, and reporting requirements.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that demand of excise duty equal to 10%/5% unsustainable as Cenvat credit in respect of common input service used in the manufacture of exempted goods reversed.
ITAT Delhi held that sales cannot be added under section 68 of the Income Tax Act unless they are proved as bogus on the basis of some reliable evidences.
ITAT Surat held that revisionary order passed by PCIT under section 263 of the Income Tax Act without providing adequate opportunity to the assessee to file relevant material evidences and documents before him is liable to be remanded back for fresh consideration of the matter.
ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act cannot exceed the amount of exempt income. Hence, AO directed to restrict the disallowance to the extent of exempt income earned.
ITAT Kolkata held that addition on account of lesser amount considered as claw back payment unsustained as in case, a higher amount is to be considered as claw back payment, then a higher amount is to be allowed as a deduction not character of income
ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained cash credit sustained as identity and creditworthiness of the parties and genuineness of the transaction not proved.
