CIT (Exemptions) Vs Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (Orissa High Court) On 12th January 2022, the CIT (E) issued a show cause notice (SCN) to the Assessee under Section 263 of the Act stating that a sum of Rs.1,11,54,33,001/- collected as development fees from its students had been directly carried to the balance sheet under […]
Deciding appeal on ex parte basis on very first day of hearing is unjustified & such order is vitiated due to violation of principles of natural justice
It is settled proposition of law that proceedings initiated and orders passed in the name of the dead person is not valid. However, it appears that the AO was not aware of the fact of death of the assessee and the copy of death certificate is furnished for the first time before us.
A compounding application under Section 279(2) of Income-tax Act, 1961 was made and is pending adjudication by CCIT. In the event of acceptance of compounding application, Act prescribes closure of criminal case.
The main plea of the petitioners is that the anticipatory bail of these petitioners stand on a better footing than that of two co-accused who have been admitted on interim bail by the Hon’ble Supreme Court who were the Chartered Accountants and against whom there is direct allegation of paying illegal gratification to the principal accused and they were instrumental in getting the accounts of different Income Tax assessees transferred from Kolkata to Ranchi.
ITAT held that lease rental received by assessee on leasing of alloys cannot be treated as royalty in terms of India-USA DTAA & provisions of section 9(1)(vi)
CESTAT held that activity of treatment of effluent water is exempt from Service Tax under Notification No. 08/2017-S.T. dated 20.02.2017
Assessment order cannot be termed as erroneous and prejudicial to interests of revenue if AO has taken one of possible views of matter.
Appellant submitted that interest on disputed tax does not come within expression remaining tax for Section 112(8) of CGST Act, 2017
PCIT Vs Karan Polymers Pvt. Ltd (Calcutta High Court) Short issue involved in the instant case is whether assumption of jurisdiction by PCIT under Section 263 of the Act was justified. The learned Tribunal noted that the issue based on which the PCIT assumed jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Act was the very same […]
