In our opinion, the assessee is having no explanation with regard to generation of scraps and sale of the same. In our opinion, it is only a make-believe story so as to account the unaccounted cash generation by assessee. In view of this, we do not find any merit in the argument of the learned Counsel for the assessee.
Court is of the view that the recovery of the annual report and the share certificate of the Petitioner from premises of Minda Group cannot be considered to be incriminating documents.
In the present case, admittedly the whole of the service was provided outside India and received outside India, therefore, even in terms of the said rule, the service tax is not leviable on the Business Exhibition Service received by the appellant which was performed outside India hence not taxable in the hands of the appellant.
Ratnamani Metal And Tubes Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Ahmedabad) We find that there is no dispute to the use of the subject second hand office furniture/equipment in relation to the manufacturing of goods and hence the subject goods are part of complete stainless steel tube manufacturing plant. The authorities below have nevertheless taken […]
