Follow Us:

Archive: 26 September 2008

Posts in 26 September 2008

Exchange rate notification for Import of /exported goods w.e.f. 1st October, 2008

September 26, 2008 1186 Views 0 comment Print

with effect from 1st October, 2008 be the rate mentioned against it in the corresponding entry in column (3) thereof, for the purpose of the said section, relating to imported and export goods.

Merely because others follow the same accounting policy, it cannot be said to be beyond scrutiny

September 26, 2008 1486 Views 0 comment Print

Merely because other clubs follow the very same accounting policy, it cannot be said to be beyond scrutiny or verification as to the correctness and completeness of the accounting practice followed, and there is any deficiency in such accounting practice or policy, it can very well be tinkered with howsoever universally followed such policy is; there is no proposition in law to force the revenue to accept the accounting system

Authentication of supply invoice by the Central Excise Authorities for Claiming Deemed export benefits-reg

September 26, 2008 1027 Views 0 comment Print

These instructions may be brought to the notice of the trade / exporters by issuing suitable Trade / Public Notices. Suitable Standing orders/instructions may be issued for the guidance of the field officers. Difficulties faced, if any in the implementation of the Circular may please be brought to the notice of the Board at an early date.

Issue of installation certificate for the capital goods imported/ procured locally under EPCG scheme-procedure-reg

September 26, 2008 7138 Views 0 comment Print

These instructions may be brought to the notice of the trade / exporters by issuing suitable Trade / Public Notices. Suitable Standing orders/instructions may be issued for the guidance of the field officers. Difficulties faced, if any in the implementation of the Circular may please be brought to the notice of the Board at an early date.

Whether There Is A Direct Conflict Of Decisions Delivered By Division Bench?

September 26, 2008 823 Views 0 comment Print

It is also to be noted that Dr. Pal at that point of time tried to distinguish the said judgment in the Hamilton’s case (supra) with the judgment of Hope (India) Ltd. (supra) and submitted that there is no inconsistency in the view taken by the subsequent Division Bench in the Hope (India) Ltd case (supra) and in this subsequent decision the Hon’ble Division Bench duly considered the judgment delivered in the Hamilton’s case

Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930