Analysis of HC, SC and ITAT Judgment on Taxation and Corporate Law

DEPB – Whether aluminium grills can be termed as Extruded aluminium products, and if so, Whether assessee can take benefit of Item 7 of Code 61 – No, rules SC

The core issue that falls for our consideration and decision in this appeal is: whether aluminium grills can be termed as Extruded aluminium products? If the answer is in positive, the assessee would be covered by Item Serial No.7 of the Product Code 61 of the Duty Entitlement Passbook Scheme (for short "the DEPB Scheme"). The assessee has succeeded before the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal'). The Revenue in this appeal cal..
Full Article

Foreign Lawyers cannot practice law in India – Madras High Court

A.K. Balaji vs. GOI (Madras High Court) -This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to take appropriate action against respondents or any other Foreign Law Firm or Foreign Lawyers, who are illegally practising the Profession of Law in India, and for a further direction to forbear them from having any legal practice either on the litigation side or in the field of non-..
Full Article

If facts are similar, Tribunal directs CIT(A) to re-decide the appeal in line with direction issued by Tribunal in its earlier order

At the time of hearing, the learned AR submitted that the assessee company has not received assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 r/w section 143(3) for the assessment year 2002-03 as stated by the Assessing Officer that the order was dispatched by speed post on 31st December, 2009. The company received notice u/s 220(1)(i) of the Act for the outstanding payment and thereafter the assessee informed the Assessing Officer that he has not received the ord..
Full Article

No Penalty U/s. 271AAA Even If Tax On Undisclosed Income Unpaid

DCIT vs. Pioneer Marbles & Interiors Pvt Ltd (ITAT Kolkata) - Under the scheme of Section 271 AAA, there is a complete paradigm shift so far as penalty in respect of unaccounted income unearthed as a result of search operation carried out on or after 1st June 2007 is concerned. Unlike in the case of penalty under section 271(1)(c), Section 271 AAA, without any reference to findings or presumptions of concealment of income or the findings or presumptions of furnishing o..
Full Article

Banks eligible to claim deduction for bad debts u/s 36(1)(vii) in respect of advances and also claim provision for bad and doubtful debts u/s 36(1)(viia)

Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court) -Under Section 36(1) (vii) of the ITA 1961, the tax payer carrying on business is entitled to a deduction, in the computation of taxable profits, of the amount of any debt which is established to have become a bad debt during the previous year, subject to certain conditions. However, a mere provision for bad and doubtful debt(s) is not allowed as a deduction in the computation of taxable profits.
Full Article

Applicability of Provisions of Section 194C to the payments to Calcutta Dock Labour Board (CDLB)

Assessee has made payments to the CDLB for supply of these workers. As long as the assessee has made payments to the CDLB for supply of labour, even when this labour may be treated as employed by the assessee for all practical purposes, the provisions of Section 194 C are clearly attracted. In such a situation, i.e. when labour hired by the assessee through CDLB is considered to be in assessee’s employment, the payments made to CDLB cannot be treated as payments for â€..
Full Article

Date of filing of the return is relevant date to consider the applicability of the proviso to section 245R(2) of the Act

In Re- Red Hat India Private Limited- Date of filing of the return is the relevant date to consider the applicability of the proviso to section 245R(2) of the Act, and that the filing of the return of income generates questions including the ones raised before this Authority, the jurisdiction to give a ruling in the present application has to be held to be barred. We are, therefore, constrained to reject the application as being barred by clause (i) of the proviso to sec..
Full Article

Interest payable U/s. 220(2) to be computed from the date of fresh assessment order if original been set aside

in case the assessment is set aside by the CIT(A) and setting aside become final, interest u/s. 220(2) has to be charged only after the expiry of 35 days from the date of service of demand notice pursuant to the fresh assessment order. In the case of the assessee, since the original order of assessment was confirmed by the CIT (A) but on further appeal, the Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and the issue restored to the AO, it was held that in terms of the circu..
Full Article
Page 1 of 38612345...102030...Last »
Copyright © TaxGuru 2011. All Rights Reserved.
About Us - Advertise - Privacy Policy - Back to top