Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kanchan Supplier through its Proprietor Vs State of Punjab (Punjab and Haryana HC)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kanchan Supplier through its Proprietor Vs State of Punjab (Punjab and Haryana High Court) Confiscated goods and vehicles can be released by depositing 25% of the amount mentioned in the Order in cash and furnishing a bank guarantee for the balance Introduction: The Punjab and Haryana High Court, in the case of M/s. Kanchan Supplier v. State of Punjab and Ors., clarified significant aspects related to tax disputes and the rights of the assessee. This article delves into the details of the case, the court’s findings, and the implications of the judgment. The Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana H...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. UMRAO SINGH says:

    Law is simple, if the aggrieved parties i.e goods owner and vehicle owner do not file any reply or apper before the proper officer, the rigours of section 130 has to be endured. So reply to notice MOV-07 and MOV-09, otherwise i goods and vehicle will be conficated u/s 130.

Cancel reply

Leave a Comment to UMRAO SINGH

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930