Case Law Details
Case Name : Commissioner Vs Prem Mehandi Center (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Commissioner Vs Prem Mehandi Center (CESTAT Delhi)
CESTAT Delhi held that refund of excise duty paid on Henna Powder and Henna Paste in terms of notification no. 11/2017-CE (NT) dated 24.04.2017 rejected as refund claim was not filed within a period of six months from the date of issuance of notification.
Facts- The respondent is engaged in the manufacture of Henna Powder and Henna Paste. It believed that these two products manufactured by it would fall under Chapter 14 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 attracting nil rate of duty. The department, however, believed that these two products...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

