This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Authorities can grant stay on deposit of amounts less than 20% of disputed demand
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Dr B L Kapur Memorial Hospital Vs CIT (TDS) (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14 and 2014-15
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Dr B L Kapur Memorial Hospital Vs CIT (TDS) (Delhi High Court)
HC Court is of the view that the requirement of payment of twenty per cent of disputed tax demand is not a pre-requisite for putting in abeyance recovery of demand pending first appeal in all cases. The said pre-condition of deposit of twenty per cent of the demand can be relaxed in appropriate cases. Even the Office Memorandum dated 29th February, 2016, gives instances like where addition on the same issue has been deleted by the appellate authorities in the previous years or where the decision of the Supreme Court or jurisdiction...
