CESTAT rejected duty demands as no evidence of circular trading or overvaluation found
CA Sandeep Kanoi
10 Jan 2026
204 Views
1 comment
Print
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Custom Duty |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Custom Duty |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary
Warning: Undefined variable $all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 80
Case Law Details
Case Name : Commissioner of Customs Vs Adani Enterprises Ltd. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Warning: Undefined array key 3 in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 95
Warning: Undefined array key 3 in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 95
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Ahmedabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Commissioner of Customs Vs Adani Enterprises Ltd. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed multiple appeals filed by the Revenue against a common adjudication order that had dropped customs duty demands, confiscation, and penalties relating to imports made under Duty Free Credit Entitlement (DFCE) licences. The appeals arose from a common investigation alleging misuse of the Incremental Export Promotion Scheme through overvaluation of exports, re-export of imported cut and polished diamonds (CPD), circular trading, and wro
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Author Bio
Comments are closed.