Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amar Kumar Agarwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amar Kumar Agarwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) Unaccounted Sales ≠ Unexplained Money — GP @10% Yes, 69A & 115BBE No; Dumb Papers & Streedhan Save the Day Kolkata ITAT delivered a comprehensive, issue-wise ruling in the group search cases of Amar Kumar Agarwal for AYs 2017-18 to 2021-22, drawing clear lines between unaccounted business receipts and unexplained money. On battery business cash receipts found during search, Tribunal held that where unaccounted receipts are admittedly from out-of-book sales, entire turnover cannot be taxed u/s 69A. Only the profit element is taxable. While C...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930