Jayanti Dalmia Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court) In this case ITAT has upheld the order of CIT with respect to non-compliance of notice issued under Section 142(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Appellant-assessee and the consequent imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(b) of the Act. Briefly stated the relevant facts are that the […]
DCIT Vs Vipul Suresh Kumar Modi (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT held that no addition can be made for Transactions in Penny Stocks in respect of unabated assessments which have become final in absence of any incriminating material found during search. The brief facts of the case relevant to the issue before us are that the Assessee, […]
Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT held that fees paid by the assessee (HAL) to CGTM France for Payment for Flight Testing Services which includes (i) Air intake Survey (ii) Engine bay, FACEC bay and oil cooling systems (iii) Engine Accessories and FADEC vibrations (iv) Measurement of gas concentration of fire extinguishing systems […]
In our opinion, the addition of such types which are made during the course of survey on oath cannot be made unless there is a supporting material. In our opinion, the addition on estimated basis cannot be justified for reasons, the AO has not rejected the books of account.
Hon’ble Karnataka High Court held that wearing of hijab by Muslim women does not form a part of essential religious practice in Islamic faith.
CBDT relaxes requirement of electronic filing of application in Form No. 3CF for seeking approval under section 35(1)(ii)/(iia)/(iii) of Income-tax Act, 1961 vide Income Tax Circular No. 5/2022 | Dated 16th March 2022. F. No. 225/54/2022/ITA-II Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Direct Taxes New Delhi Income Tax Circular […]
Arman Advisory Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT noted that the Ld. CIT(A) has made a bald statement that the AO’s assessment order attracts Explanation 2(c) u/s. 263 of the Act. However, he failed to spell out in his impugned order how the action of AO while framing the assessment order is not in […]
Bhagyalaxmi Nagri Sahakari Patsanstha Meryadit Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) The first item is the commission income from MSEDCL amounting to Rs.60,363/-. The assessee has contended in its written submissions that similar issue came up for consideration before the Pune Tribunal in Banganga Nagri Sah. Patsanstha Ltd. (ITA No.873/PUN/2014) and the Tribunal, vide its order dated […]
There is nothing in Section 54/54F which specify that the residential house should be constructed in a particular manner. Any person will construct his house according to his need and on the basis of future requirements.
The old GST monthly KPI as prescribed in Internal Circular 33A of 2019 will be discontinued from March 22 and the new KPI formats as prescribed by this Internal Circular will be applicable from 1st April 2022, for reporting the periods March 2022 onwards on monthly basis.
