Income Tax : Explore remedies for taxpayers under the Income Tax Act, 1961, comparing appeals & revisions. Understand procedures, limitations &...
Income Tax : On commencement of regular assessment proceedings u/s 143(2) of Act , there is no need for intimation u/s 143(1)(a)(i) Where the s...
Income Tax : Substantial question of Law (SQL). On interpretation of section 260A of the Income Tax Act , 1961 and section 100 of the code of c...
Income Tax : A remedy by way of appeal from the orders of ITAT is provided both u/s.260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and u/s.15 (w.e.f. 6-1- 20...
Income Tax : PCIT Vs Farmson Pharmaceuticals Gujarat Pvt Ltd (Gujarat High Court): Reassessment cannot be solely based on a reevaluation of exi...
Income Tax : Explore the case of Pipelic Energy Software India Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT at Telangana High Court. Detailed analysis on why subsidiary exp...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court allows income tax deduction for payment clearing mortgage, dismissing Revenue’s appeal under section 263. Ful...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court ruled on N H Kapadia Education Trust vs ACIT, addressing the corpus donation eligibility for exemption under Se...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court dismisses Revenue’s appeal in CIT Vs Joshi Technologies, allowing additional depreciation on oil wells u/s 32...
DGFT : All conditions in policy circular no 15 of 1st February 2011 will continue to apply, except the specification about dates and the ...
ITAT Kolkata held that revisionary proceedings u/s. 263 initiated in the name of non-existent entity, despite the fact that private limited company was converted into LLP and the conversion was brought to the knowledge of AO, is void ab initio and invalid.
The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) order passed without Document Identification Number (DIN) number should be treated as invalid and was contrary to the CBDT Circular No.19/2019 dated 14th August 2019 as it was clear in the body of DRP order, no DIN number was mentioned nor there was any reason of not mentioning the DIN number in order of the DRP.
Delhi High Court dismissed condonation of delay in filing of appeals by revenue in absence of any sufficient cause shown. Court observed that no action is taken against the officers who sit on files and do nothing under presumption that the court would condone delay in routine.
Delhi High Court held that the assessee company being a debt free company the question of receiving any interest on receivables did not arise. Accordingly, the adjustment made by AO on account of interest on outstanding receivables. Writ dismissed as no substantial question of law arose.
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained investment unsustainable as nature and source of the investment duly explained.
Orissa High Court held that order passed under Section 254 (2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be construed to be an order within the meaning of Section 260A to make it appealable before this Court.
Supreme Court held that profits earned on account of foreign exchange fluctuation cannot be included/ treated as derived from the business of export income. Accordingly, deduction under section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act not available.
Gujarat High Court held that initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in the absence of any material to establish the concealing of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars unsustainable-in-law.
Delhi High Court held that disallowance of travel expenditure unjustified as the expenses incurred had a nexus with the business interest of the respondent/assessee and AO has not brought anything on record to prove that the expenditure were of personal nature.
Delhi High Court supports ITAT’s verdict on the selection of comparables for determining the Arm’s Length Price of an international transaction. Get insights on PCIT vs Chrys Capital
