Goods and Services Tax : Analyzing GST Waiver Scheme under Section 128A—Did it provide relief or reward non-compliance? Key issues, challenges, and impli...
Goods and Services Tax : FY 2024-25 saw numerous GST audits and SCNs, creating compliance hurdles. Retrospective demands and procedural issues challenged b...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTR 9 & 9C FY 2023-24 के लिए नवीनतम बदलाव, पुन: मिलान और फाइलिं�...
Goods and Services Tax : Understand the impact of changes in Table 8A of GSTR-9 for FY 2023-24. Learn about ITC double-counting issues and solutions for ac...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn how GSTR-2A ensures GST compliance, prevents tax evasion, facilitates ITC accuracy, and aids in reconciliation, audits, and ...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN – Upcoming changes/initiatives:- ♦ SMS based NIL Return filing for GSTR-3B and GSTR-1. ♦ Improvements in GSTR-2A to sho...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. Certain notified taxpayers have been issuing invoices after obtaining Invoice Reference Number (IRN) from Invoice Registration ...
Goods and Services Tax : Direct Taxes Professionals’ Association requested Hon’ble Finance Minister to allow filing of GSTR 9, 9A and 9C for the F.Y. 2...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN enables taxpayers to know Input Tax Credit (ITC) eligibility at invoice level while filing Annual Return – Taxpayers ar...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. A facility has been provided to the taxpayers to download document wise details of Table 8A of Form GSTR-9, from the portal in ...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras HC sets aside GST order against DS Engineering, ordering a rehearing after 10% tax deposit. Dispute over GSTR 3B/2A mismatc...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court remands ITC claim, orders partial deposit, and grants new objection chance in Chinnadurai Saravanan vs Deputy St...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court sets aside a GST demand order due to improper service, remanding the case with a condition to deposit 25% of the...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras HC quashes GST order against Ragul Industries, allowing new evidence for GSTR 3B/2A/1 mismatches, subject to 25% tax deposi...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court remanded the matter as notice in DRC-01A was merely uploaded in GST portal and hence petitioner was unaware abou...
Goods and Services Tax : Read Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST from CBIC regarding the clarification on availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) in GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A ...
Goods and Services Tax : Clarification to deal with difference in Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed in FORM GSTR-3B as compared to that detailed in FORM GSTR-...
Goods and Services Tax : It has been noticed that in a few cases, certain records are not reflected in GSTR-2B statement for the period of April 2022. Howe...
Goods and Services Tax : Condition made under sub-rule (4) of rule 36 of the CGST Rules shall apply cumulatively for the tax period February, March, April,...
Goods and Services Tax : The GST Council, in its 39th meeting held on 14th March 2020, had recommended to adopt and implement the incremental approach of...
Delhi HC rules that GST registration cannot be withheld due to pending liabilities. Directions issued to process cancellation request swiftly.
Madras High Court held that order confirming tax liability and imposing penalty on ground of mismatch of input tax claim between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A set aside as order passed without giving opportunity of being heard.
Calcutta HC remands GST case after consultant’s failure to inform petitioner of SCN. The court set aside the order u/s 73(9) CGST Act, for fresh consideration.
Madras HC sets aside GST demand and recovery notice against Tvl. Bright Power Projects due to a lack of hearing opportunity, remands case for reconsideration.
Delhi High Court directed petitioner to satisfactorily prove that payment was duly made for inward supplies in respect of which it had claimed refund of accumulated Input Tax Credit (ITC).
Learn how to use the GSTR-2A/2B vs Books Reconciliation Tool effectively. Follow steps for updating data, reconciling, and reviewing results.
Madras High Court orders reconsideration of Silk Junction vs Deputy State Tax Officer case over GSTR 1 and e-way bill mismatch.
Madras HC remands GST order for reconsideration, requiring 10% tax payment within 15 days and a reply to the show cause notice before a fresh order is issued.
HC sets aside tax order, allowing petitioner to submit a response and remit 10% of the disputed amount. New decision to be issued within three months.
Madras High Court remands GST demand order for Santhinarayanan Santhoshkumar, imposing a Rs. 1.5 lakh pre-deposit condition and allowing an appeal.
