Goods and Services Tax : Analyzing GST Waiver Scheme under Section 128A—Did it provide relief or reward non-compliance? Key issues, challenges, and impli...
Goods and Services Tax : FY 2024-25 saw numerous GST audits and SCNs, creating compliance hurdles. Retrospective demands and procedural issues challenged b...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTR 9 & 9C FY 2023-24 के लिए नवीनतम बदलाव, पुन: मिलान और फाइलिं�...
Goods and Services Tax : Understand the impact of changes in Table 8A of GSTR-9 for FY 2023-24. Learn about ITC double-counting issues and solutions for ac...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn how GSTR-2A ensures GST compliance, prevents tax evasion, facilitates ITC accuracy, and aids in reconciliation, audits, and ...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN – Upcoming changes/initiatives:- ♦ SMS based NIL Return filing for GSTR-3B and GSTR-1. ♦ Improvements in GSTR-2A to sho...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. Certain notified taxpayers have been issuing invoices after obtaining Invoice Reference Number (IRN) from Invoice Registration ...
Goods and Services Tax : Direct Taxes Professionals’ Association requested Hon’ble Finance Minister to allow filing of GSTR 9, 9A and 9C for the F.Y. 2...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN enables taxpayers to know Input Tax Credit (ITC) eligibility at invoice level while filing Annual Return – Taxpayers ar...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. A facility has been provided to the taxpayers to download document wise details of Table 8A of Form GSTR-9, from the portal in ...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras HC sets aside GST order against DS Engineering, ordering a rehearing after 10% tax deposit. Dispute over GSTR 3B/2A mismatc...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court remands ITC claim, orders partial deposit, and grants new objection chance in Chinnadurai Saravanan vs Deputy St...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court sets aside a GST demand order due to improper service, remanding the case with a condition to deposit 25% of the...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras HC quashes GST order against Ragul Industries, allowing new evidence for GSTR 3B/2A/1 mismatches, subject to 25% tax deposi...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court remanded the matter as notice in DRC-01A was merely uploaded in GST portal and hence petitioner was unaware abou...
Goods and Services Tax : Read Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST from CBIC regarding the clarification on availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) in GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A ...
Goods and Services Tax : Clarification to deal with difference in Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed in FORM GSTR-3B as compared to that detailed in FORM GSTR-...
Goods and Services Tax : It has been noticed that in a few cases, certain records are not reflected in GSTR-2B statement for the period of April 2022. Howe...
Goods and Services Tax : Condition made under sub-rule (4) of rule 36 of the CGST Rules shall apply cumulatively for the tax period February, March, April,...
Goods and Services Tax : The GST Council, in its 39th meeting held on 14th March 2020, had recommended to adopt and implement the incremental approach of...
In a recent ruling Hon’ble Madras HC considered that there is mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A and petitioner is ready to pay 25 % of the total tax in dispute. HC granted on more opportunity to the petitioner after complying the directions.
Assessee should deposit 25% of the disputed tax within a period of four (4) weeks for a fresh hearing in matters engaging the discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A returns.
During the scrutiny of GST monthly returns for AY 2018-19, it was found that there existed a difference between the ITC available as per GSTR-2A and ITC availed as per GSTR-3B to the tune of Rs.10,22,809/- of IGST.
The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a notice dated 22.03.2024 issued u/s. 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as well as the order dated 31.03.2024 issued u/s. 148A(d) of the Act.
GSTR 9 & 9C FY 2023-24 के लिए नवीनतम बदलाव, पुन: मिलान और फाइलिंग आवश्यकताओं को समझें, जिसमें ITC और कर देनदारी पर प्रमुख अपडेट शामिल हैं।
During the scrutiny of the petitioner’s monthly return, it was found that there was a short payment of taxes due to excess claim of Input Tax Credit and alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A/GSTR-2B.
Madras High Court held that order confirming demand due to mismatch between returns under GST set aside with condition to deposit 25% of disputed tax amount since petitioner neither replied to DRC-01 and neither attended personal hearing.
During the relevant period, the petitioner filed its return and paid the appropriate taxes. While scrutinizing the petitioner’s monthly return, it was noticed that there was mismatch between GSTR-01 and GSTR-3B/GSTR-2A/2B.
Madras High Court held that since petitioner failed to respond to notice issued for mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A and non-payment of interest, it is directed that opportunity to explain discrepancies will be granted on payment of 25% of disputed tax.
Held that the impugned order dated 29.08.2024 is set aside and the petitioner shall deposit 10% of the disputed tax within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
