ITAT directs CIT(A) to reconsider issue of Section 234A, 234B and 234C interest after considering the outcome of petition filed by the appellant u/s. 119(20)(b)/119(2)(c) of Income Tax Act before the Chairman, CBDT
Explore the ITAT Chennai ruling on DCIT Vs Arumuga Cottspin Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2015-16. Analysis of interest disallowance, sales suppression, and unexplained cash credits
Explore the ITAT Chennai’s order in the case of Tulsian Refinery Pvt. Limited vs. DCIT for AY 2016-17 & 2017-18. Discover how the deletion of additions related to bogus interest expenditure was determined through sworn statements and reconciliation statements, and the impact of Hon’ble ITSC’s findings on KRPL. Read the full text of the order and gain insights into the assessment and appellate proceedings.
Explore the ITO vs. Papathiyammal Pitchai Educational Trust case at ITAT Chennai, where a dispute over the denial of Section 11 deduction unfolds for AY 2020-21.
ITAT Chennai upholds disallowance of registration fees and stamp duty for non-submission of evidence in case of Padmanabhan Mohan vs ITO.
ITAT Chennai held that addition towards unexplained investment u/s. 69B of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as based merely on the basis of statement of Director of the Vendor Company without any additional corroborative evidence.
Explore the ITAT Chennai order on Rajamanikam Meerabai Vs ITO. Detailed analysis of the capital gain dispute, assessment details, and legal arguments. Verdict insights.
Explore the ITAT Chennai order in ATC (Assam) Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO-TDS for AY 2016-17. Key issues include TDS on rental payments, interest imposition, and disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia).
ITAT Chennai held that addition u/s. 2(22)(e) towards amount received by shareholder company treating debit balance as deemed dividend unsustainable as debit balance was only because of an inadvertent error and the same was squared off within short period.
ITAT Chennai held that only the mistake apparent from record which can be rectified but where two views are possible or there is a debate available, it cannot be rectified u/s.154 of the Income Tax Act.