Sponsored
    Follow Us:

ITAT Bangalore

Cash Transactions between Trust & Managing Trustee not attracts Section 269SS

May 2, 2022 15789 Views 0 comment Print

Akash Education & Development Trust Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Bangalore) In the present case, the assessee is a registered society u/s. 12AA of the Act and its income is exempt u/s. 11 of the Act. The assessee in the stage of establishment of educational institution has undertaken the construction activity of building for the purpose […]

Addition permissible on the basis of digital data recovered during search

May 1, 2022 2802 Views 0 comment Print

With regard to the evidentiary value of data recovered from computer in the form of digital data and other documents listed in earlier part of this order is concerned, section 132(4) of the Income-tax Act, permits the authorised officer to seize books of accounts and other documents.

TDS Rate on subcontracting charges paid to Chinese subsidiary will be 10% instead of 20% under Indo-China DTAA

April 24, 2022 3441 Views 0 comment Print

Infosys Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Conclusion: The applicable rate of TDS on subcontracting charges paid to Infosys China should be considered at 10% as per the India-China DTAA instead of 20% as per section 206AA. Held: Assessee was an Indian company, engaged in the business of development and export of computer software and related […]

Interest income, converted into Government’s equity for Metro Project, not a revenue receipt

April 24, 2022 918 Views 0 comment Print

It is clear that the income generated out of earlier release of State Government for its project would have to be converted into State’s equity towards the project and the same cannot be counted as income of BMRCL. Thus, there is no profit motive as the entire fund entrusted and the interest accrued therefrom has to be utilized only for the purpose of scheme. Thus, it has to be capitalized and cannot be considered as revenue receipts.

Amount received from transfer of agricultural land eligible for tax exemption

April 24, 2022 2367 Views 0 comment Print

G.N. Venugopal Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) Conclusion: Merely because of the fact that the land was sold for profit, it could not be held that income arising from the sale of land was taxable as profit arising from the adventure in the nature of trade. Where land was not subjected to any conversion as non-agricultural […]

Section 54 Deduction available on incomplete construction too consideration received used for constructing a residential house

April 23, 2022 3297 Views 0 comment Print

The passport to derive benefit under sec. 54F(1) is investment in construction of property within the period required u/s 54(1)F or to invest in residential property within the stipulated time for enabling deduction under section 54F of the Act.

ALP determinable for international transaction of Corporate Guarantee

April 23, 2022 1800 Views 0 comment Print

ALP of corporate guarantee has to be determined as it falls within scope and ambit of an international transaction after retrospective amendment to section 92B and 0.5% corporate guarantee is held to be appropriate.

Provisions of DTAA override section 206AA of Income Tax Act

April 20, 2022 2220 Views 0 comment Print

Infosys Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)  The relevant ground with regard to the above issue are grounds 9.1 to 9.3. The Special Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Nagarjuna Fertilizders and Chemicals Ltd. v. ACIT reported in (2017) 78 taxmann.com 264 had held if rate of tax applicable under DTAA is lower than […]

Court can condone delay in Appeal filing if sufficient cause exist

April 20, 2022 28098 Views 0 comment Print

Sri Suhas Suresh Shet Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) In the matter of condonation of delay in filing appeals beyond the limitation period, the courts are empowered to condone the delay, provided the litigant is able to demonstrate that there was ‘sufficient cause’ in preferring appeal beyond the limitation period. The Courts have also held that […]

Service Tax Collected but not paid to Government disallowable under section 43B

April 19, 2022 3876 Views 0 comment Print

If the assessee actually received service Tax from its customers and kept it without depositing the same within due date of filing of return of income u/s.139(1) of the Act, then only the AO has to invoke the provisions of Section 43B and bring that amount to tax.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031