Goods and Services Tax : Haryana revives entry tax after 8 years, sparking legal concerns. Understand the implications, recovery limits, and legal remedies...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn about VAT registration, eligibility criteria, required documents, VAT rates, and filing process in the UAE. Stay compliant w...
Income Tax : Learn about TDS under Section 194Q and TCS under Section 206C(1H) on goods sales and purchases, including rates, thresholds, and c...
Goods and Services Tax : Discover the legal stance on transitioning unutilized VAT credit under GST regime, as per a recent ruling by the Madras High Court...
Income Tax : Explore the nexus between tax avoidance and inequality in India. Learn how legal loopholes deepen economic divides and discover st...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore Supreme Court's scrutiny of whether supplying cranes for services like loading, unloading, lifting, and shifting qualifies...
Goods and Services Tax : Goa (Recovery of Arrears of Tax, Interest, Penalty, Other Dues through Settlement) Act, 2023 The Goa (Recovery of Arrears of Tax, ...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGHLIGHTS OF THE MAHARASHTRA STATE BUDGET SPEECH DATED 9TH MARCH, 2023 BY HONOURABLE DEPUTY CHIEF MINISTER (FINANCE) SHRI DEVENDR...
Goods and Services Tax : office of the Jt. Commissioner of State Tax. (HQ-1) F-Wing, 7th floor, New bldg, GST Bhavan, Mazgaon, Mumbai-400010. Tel No. 022 2...
Goods and Services Tax : Rajasthan VAT – ITC Mismatch/ Verification Date Extended to 31.03.2022 & In some cases requirement of Affidavit also R...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta HC rules that Crescent Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd. must pay output tax for the disputed period, as input tax credit adjustmen...
Goods and Services Tax : Jharkhand High Court directs tax authorities to refund excess tax retained after assessment reduction, ruling it violates Articles...
Goods and Services Tax : The petitioner, who was running the business of a Bar and Restaurant in Ananthapur Town, had registered himself as a dealer, under...
Service Tax : Karnataka High Court held that transfer of Set Top Boxes to subscribers amounts to sale within the definition of section 2(29)(d) ...
Goods and Services Tax : Gujarat High Court quashes FIR against KGN Enterprises in alleged bogus billing and ITC claim case, citing ongoing tribunal procee...
Corporate Law : Maharashtra amends MVAT Act with retrospective effect from 2005, clarifying tax exemptions, deemed sales, and first charge provisi...
Goods and Services Tax : Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal (MSTT) launches a website for case updates, hearings, and judgments, replacing physical cause lists...
Finance : Maharashtra amends VAT Rules 2005 to introduce Rule 34A, mandating the publication of pending appeal cases on the common portal. D...
Goods and Services Tax : Discover the latest Maharashtra VAT Act amendment providing relief for late filers. Learn about the changes, due dates, and late f...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn about the latest notification from the Maharashtra Finance Department granting late fee waivers for Profession Tax Payers. U...
Atlas Jewellery (P) Ltd Vs Deputy Commissioner (Kerala High Court) Tax Assessment: Orders passed while the Managing Director was detained in a foreign nation are unsustainable – Violation of principles of natural justice: High Court of Kerala. It is proclaimed in Atlas Jewellery [P] Ltd Vs. The Deputy Commissioner & Ors (W.P.(C) No. 21798 of […]
It has recently come to notice that, An account was de-freezed on the basis of the letter signed by the Ward In-charge, whereas it was later found that no such letters/communications was issued from the concerned Ward In-charge.
It is the common experience that Commercial Tax office, is considered to be one of the the hubs of corruption. Poor and gullible drivers would fell prey for the illegal demands day in and day out. Only when the greed is too high, some cases reach the higher ups or the Lokayuktha.
Authority For Clarification and Advance Ruling Vs Aakavi Spinning Mills (P) Ltd (Supreme Court) As noticed, the Entry in question, as inserted into the Fourth Schedule to the Act, is clear and specific that is, Hank Yarn; it carries neither any ambiguity nor any confusion. Undoubtably, the yarn in the hank form (which is a […]
Rajasthan Government notifies ‘Amnesty Scheme-2022′, as the scheme, for rebate of tax and settlement of outstanding demands and disputed amounts. This scheme shall come into force with immediate effect and shall remain in force upto 31.8.2022. FINANCE DEPARTMENT (TAX DIVISION) Jaipur, February 24, 2021 In pursuance of clause (3) of Article 348 of the Constitution […]
Nehal Ashwinkumar Shah Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) Gujarat High Court held that unlike Section 179 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, there is no provision in the Sales Tax Act fastening the liability of the company to pay its sales tax dues on its Director. It further held that The attachment on […]
Assistant Commissioner Vs C.P. Agro Industries (Rajasthan High Court) The Tax Board has neither recorded any cogent finding on merits of the case before setting aside the penalty nor it has considered the provisions of section 61 of the RVAT Act, 2003, more particularly, when the fact was proved before all the Authorities that Forms-C […]
Kaveri Home Needs Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court) Considering the fact that the petitioner has shown scant regards of the assessment proceedings under the TNVAT Act, 2006, I do not find any merits in the present writ petition. Further, this writ petition has been filed for an order which came to be passed […]
Imposition of penalty is called for where the assessee fails to furnish returns by the due date, which is not the position in the present case. Admittedly, Petitioner has deposited the requisite tax for the relevant quarter of the assessment period but has inadvertently mentioned the wrong period in the challan and therefore, cannot be, in our view, saddled with the liability of penalty.
Whether Rajasthan Tax Board was justified in law in holding that respondent cannot be hold responsible for amount not deposited by selling dealer and allowed benefit of Input Tax Credit which ultimately will amount to double jeopardy to State as selling dealer has not deposited tax whereas subsequent dealer has claimed benefit of Input Tax Credit.
