Goods and Services Tax : Explore the applicability of time limits specified in Section 16(4) for claiming Input Tax Credit in GSTR 3B filed after the due d...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn from the case of M/s Oasys Cybernetics Pvt Ltd vs State Tax Officer how erroneous reporting in GST filings can impact demand...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn about the legal implications, remedies, and judicial precedents regarding claiming excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) in GSTR-3B ...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn why credit cant be denied when ITC not in GSTR-3B but claimable via GSTR-2A & GSTR-9. Explore a court cases analysis and imp...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the Kerala High Courts directive on rectification applications for wrongly claimed ITC under CGST and SGST instead of IGST...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN – Upcoming changes/initiatives:- ♦ SMS based NIL Return filing for GSTR-3B and GSTR-1. ♦ Improvements in GSTR-2A to sho...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. Certain notified taxpayers have been issuing invoices after obtaining Invoice Reference Number (IRN) from Invoice Registration ...
Goods and Services Tax : Direct Taxes Professionals’ Association requested Hon’ble Finance Minister to allow filing of GSTR 9, 9A and 9C for the F.Y. 2...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN enables taxpayers to know Input Tax Credit (ITC) eligibility at invoice level while filing Annual Return – Taxpayers ar...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. A facility has been provided to the taxpayers to download document wise details of Table 8A of Form GSTR-9, from the portal in ...
Goods and Services Tax : Diamond Steel Vs State of Up (Allahabad High Court) - Best judgement assessment cannot be resorted to by authorities when adjudica...
Goods and Services Tax : Read detailed analysis of Madras High Court judgment in Annalakshmi Stores Vs Deputy State Tax, where assessment orders under Sect...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court sets aside GST order for not considering Perfect Assayers Pvt Ltd’s GSTR 1 and GSTR 9 statements. Case remande...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court remands tax order for Tvl. Dharieneesh Housing, citing denial of reasonable opportunity to contest GSTR-3B and G...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court directs a rehearing for Tile Bros, citing procedural lapses in GST order. Petitioner gets another chance to expl...
Goods and Services Tax : Read Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST from CBIC regarding the clarification on availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) in GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A ...
Goods and Services Tax : Clarification to deal with difference in Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed in FORM GSTR-3B as compared to that detailed in FORM GSTR-...
Goods and Services Tax : It has been noticed that in a few cases, certain records are not reflected in GSTR-2B statement for the period of April 2022. Howe...
Goods and Services Tax : Condition made under sub-rule (4) of rule 36 of the CGST Rules shall apply cumulatively for the tax period February, March, April,...
Goods and Services Tax : The GST Council, in its 39th meeting held on 14th March 2020, had recommended to adopt and implement the incremental approach of...
Read the full judgment of Madras High Court setting aside tax liability due to inadvertent error in GSTR-1, corrected in GSTR-3b. Detailed analysis provided.
Read the full text of the judgment/order by Madras High Court quashing an assessment order due to procedural irregularities. Learn about contesting tax demand with 10% pre-deposit.
Madras High Court sets aside an order confirming Input Tax Credit (ITC) demand against Sanjai Gandhi without providing him a reasonable opportunity, directing a remand with conditions.
R.N.Leather Exports vs Assistant Commissioner case prompts Madras HC to direct disposal of rectification petitions within 2 months for GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A discrepancies.
Madras High Court sets aside an assessment order, allowing the taxpayer to reply to a show cause notice regarding discrepancies in GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A.
Detailed analysis of Nakoda Unique Gold Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST) case where Madras HC sets aside order over GSTR 3B & 2A discrepancies.
Madras High Court grants opportunity to contest GST demand despite failure to reply to SCN on 10% pre-deposit condition for discrepancy in ITC claimed.
Madras High Court sets aside GST demand orders, granting petitioner another chance to contest tax demand on merits. Full tax liability cleared for 2019-20, 50% for 2021-22.
Read the full judgment of Madras High Court’s decision to quash a GST order against APL Apollo Tubes Limited due to lack of specific reasons for denying Input Tax Credit.
In a landmark decision, Madras High Court overturns a GST order against Larsen & Toubro, citing discrepancies between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B returns. Full analysis here.
