Goods and Services Tax : Explore the significance of GSTR 9 and GSTR 9C in GST compliance, as clarified by judicial rulings. Learn about key cases and the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn about GST return scrutiny under Section 61 of the CGST Act, 2017. Understand the process, objectives, and key areas of compl...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore how to effectively respond to GST notices concerning discrepancies between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B. Understand key legal point...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the applicability of time limits specified in Section 16(4) for claiming Input Tax Credit in GSTR 3B filed after the due d...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn from the case of M/s Oasys Cybernetics Pvt Ltd vs State Tax Officer how erroneous reporting in GST filings can impact demand...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN – Upcoming changes/initiatives:- ♦ SMS based NIL Return filing for GSTR-3B and GSTR-1. ♦ Improvements in GSTR-2A to sho...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. Certain notified taxpayers have been issuing invoices after obtaining Invoice Reference Number (IRN) from Invoice Registration ...
Goods and Services Tax : Direct Taxes Professionals’ Association requested Hon’ble Finance Minister to allow filing of GSTR 9, 9A and 9C for the F.Y. 2...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN enables taxpayers to know Input Tax Credit (ITC) eligibility at invoice level while filing Annual Return – Taxpayers ar...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. A facility has been provided to the taxpayers to download document wise details of Table 8A of Form GSTR-9, from the portal in ...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court held that ex-parte order passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act without affording ade...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court remits tax case for reconsideration due to GSTR-2A discrepancies. Order requires ₹8 lakhs payment before fresh...
Goods and Services Tax : Punjab & Haryana High Court denies GST rectification after deadline in Bar Code India Ltd. case, stressing adherence to statutory ...
Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad High Court held that benefit of Input Tax Credit in case of mentioning of wrong GSTIN of recipient needs to be analysed ...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court directs rectification for IGST claimed under the wrong head in GSTR-3B due to clerical error, allowing the taxpa...
Goods and Services Tax : Read Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST from CBIC regarding the clarification on availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) in GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A ...
Goods and Services Tax : Clarification to deal with difference in Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed in FORM GSTR-3B as compared to that detailed in FORM GSTR-...
Goods and Services Tax : It has been noticed that in a few cases, certain records are not reflected in GSTR-2B statement for the period of April 2022. Howe...
Goods and Services Tax : Condition made under sub-rule (4) of rule 36 of the CGST Rules shall apply cumulatively for the tax period February, March, April,...
Goods and Services Tax : The GST Council, in its 39th meeting held on 14th March 2020, had recommended to adopt and implement the incremental approach of...
Karnataka HC remands R.S Marketing’s case, granting a fresh hearing on ITC discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A due to non-compliance with prescribed guidelines.
Madras HC remands the case of Dhirani Metal Industries vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) for reconsideration over GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A mismatch in GST liability.
Despite submitting replies in February 2024, the petitioner was unable to participate in the personal hearing due to the closure of their shop caused by metro rail construction in the vicinity. This inability to attend the hearing led to the rejection of their reply as they did not provide the necessary profit and loss account and stock details.
Read the Madras High Court’s judgment setting aside an unreasoned GST demand order against Ford India, citing GSTR 9 and GSTR 2A mismatches. Full text included.
Madras HC remands Orient Electricals & Engineers India’s case on GST liability and ITC reversal for reconsideration, highlighting procedural fairness and 12.5% pre-deposit.
Explore the Madras High Court’s decision in Banyan Engineers Contractors Vs Deputy State Tax Officer-2 regarding GST liabilities and the necessity of court intervention. Read the full text of the judgment here.
Madras High Court directs GST order imposing additional liabilities beyond the show cause notice to be treated as a fresh SCN. Full judgment details inside.
Madras HC sets aside original order, directs it to be treated as SCN in Tvl. Anandh Store Vs CTO case, allowing petitioner to reply. Read full judgment.
Under Regulation 10(n), a Customs Broker is not responsible for continuous client surveillance. Once address verification is done, any client’s address change without informing authorities isn’t the broker’s fault.
Diamond Steel Vs State of Up (Allahabad High Court) – Best judgement assessment cannot be resorted to by authorities when adjudication is made under Section 74
