Goods and Services Tax : Analyzing GST Waiver Scheme under Section 128A—Did it provide relief or reward non-compliance? Key issues, challenges, and impli...
Goods and Services Tax : FY 2024-25 saw numerous GST audits and SCNs, creating compliance hurdles. Retrospective demands and procedural issues challenged b...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTR 9 & 9C FY 2023-24 के लिए नवीनतम बदलाव, पुन: मिलान और फाइलिं�...
Goods and Services Tax : Understand the impact of changes in Table 8A of GSTR-9 for FY 2023-24. Learn about ITC double-counting issues and solutions for ac...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn how GSTR-2A ensures GST compliance, prevents tax evasion, facilitates ITC accuracy, and aids in reconciliation, audits, and ...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN – Upcoming changes/initiatives:- ♦ SMS based NIL Return filing for GSTR-3B and GSTR-1. ♦ Improvements in GSTR-2A to sho...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. Certain notified taxpayers have been issuing invoices after obtaining Invoice Reference Number (IRN) from Invoice Registration ...
Goods and Services Tax : Direct Taxes Professionals’ Association requested Hon’ble Finance Minister to allow filing of GSTR 9, 9A and 9C for the F.Y. 2...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN enables taxpayers to know Input Tax Credit (ITC) eligibility at invoice level while filing Annual Return – Taxpayers ar...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. A facility has been provided to the taxpayers to download document wise details of Table 8A of Form GSTR-9, from the portal in ...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras HC sets aside GST order against DS Engineering, ordering a rehearing after 10% tax deposit. Dispute over GSTR 3B/2A mismatc...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court remands ITC claim, orders partial deposit, and grants new objection chance in Chinnadurai Saravanan vs Deputy St...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court sets aside a GST demand order due to improper service, remanding the case with a condition to deposit 25% of the...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras HC quashes GST order against Ragul Industries, allowing new evidence for GSTR 3B/2A/1 mismatches, subject to 25% tax deposi...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court remanded the matter as notice in DRC-01A was merely uploaded in GST portal and hence petitioner was unaware abou...
Goods and Services Tax : Read Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST from CBIC regarding the clarification on availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) in GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A ...
Goods and Services Tax : Clarification to deal with difference in Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed in FORM GSTR-3B as compared to that detailed in FORM GSTR-...
Goods and Services Tax : It has been noticed that in a few cases, certain records are not reflected in GSTR-2B statement for the period of April 2022. Howe...
Goods and Services Tax : Condition made under sub-rule (4) of rule 36 of the CGST Rules shall apply cumulatively for the tax period February, March, April,...
Goods and Services Tax : The GST Council, in its 39th meeting held on 14th March 2020, had recommended to adopt and implement the incremental approach of...
Madras HC sets aside GST order against DS Engineering, ordering a rehearing after 10% tax deposit. Dispute over GSTR 3B/2A mismatch.
Madras High Court remands ITC claim, orders partial deposit, and grants new objection chance in Chinnadurai Saravanan vs Deputy State Tax Officer case.
Analyzing GST Waiver Scheme under Section 128A—Did it provide relief or reward non-compliance? Key issues, challenges, and implications for taxpayers.
FY 2024-25 saw numerous GST audits and SCNs, creating compliance hurdles. Retrospective demands and procedural issues challenged businesses.
Madras High Court sets aside a GST demand order due to improper service, remanding the case with a condition to deposit 25% of the disputed tax.
Madras HC quashes GST order against Ragul Industries, allowing new evidence for GSTR 3B/2A/1 mismatches, subject to 25% tax deposit.
Madras High Court remanded the matter as notice in DRC-01A was merely uploaded in GST portal and hence petitioner was unaware about initiated proceedings. Further, petitioner directed to deposit 25% of disputed taxes.
Allahabad HC dismisses plea in Laxmi Telecom Vs State of U.P., ruling alternative statutory remedies are available for GST disputes. Key highlights inside.
Assessee’s petition against the under declaration of ineligible Input Tax Credit ( ITC ) would be heard when assessee would deposit 10% of the disputed tax within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
The impugned order was issued thereafter on 29.04.2024. Assessee referred to the impugned order and pointed out that the reply was not considered by the proper officer because such reply was filed after four opportunities of personal hearing.
