Cenvat Credit on input services allowed if used in the course of furtherance of business

VITP Private Limited v Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)

The CESTAT, Hyderabad in the matter of M/s. VITP Private Limited v Commissioner of Central Tax, Hyderabad [Final Order No: A/30070-30073/2022 dated July 8, 2022] set aside the demand of service tax on refundable security deposit on the grounds that security deposit is refundable deposit and it cannot be included in the value of taxable service. Further, when there was no services rendered by the assessee towards t

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.