Background:

The concept of “Class Action Suits” was first introduced in the US, also known as “Representative Action”, which is usually a form of court case, filed by larger group of people collectively who has suffered same or similar injuries. However the same was not new India.

Lately in year 2005, it was recommended by “J.J. Irani Committee Report” the principle of “Class/Representative Action” by one shareholder on behalf of one or more of the shareholders of the same kind have been allowed by courts on the grounds of persons having same locus standi.”

 Post the Satyam Scandal, the Indian Parliament drafted the Companies Bill 2009 and introduces the provisions enabling shareholders to file class action suits providing a way out to small or minority group of stakeholders for redressing their grievances apart from stakeholders like Creditors, Bankers, debentures holders etc. and later in Companies Bill 2011. Thereafter the 2013 act has now introduced the concept of class action under section 245.

Quick Referencer:

Applicability All Companies except Banking Companies
Applicable Section Section 245
Applicable Rules Rule 84, 85, 86 and 87 of National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016

What are Class Action Suits under the Company Act, 2013……….?

The provisions governing Class Action is set out under the Section 245 of the Companies Act, 2013 which falls under the Chapter XVI “Prevention of oppression and Mismanagement” notified on 01st June, 2016. It contains ten different sub clauses and provides procedures & reliefs thereafter.

SECTION 245 allows specified categories of Petitioners, who forms a common opinion about the grievances against the mismanagement of company affairs (other than banking companies) by its directors, auditors  or advisors, and can collectively approach (on behalf of all) the NCLT for redressing their situation.

Introduction of this section places greater liability not only on management but on auditors & advisors so associated to act responsibly.

This relief is in addition to the Oppression & Mismanagement of the Company covered under the Section 241 & 244 of the Act. The members now can file application under 241 as well as under 245 separately and distinctly, however remedies available under the two are different, Section 241 to 244 seeks greater array of remedies to specific members, however there is no such concept of waiver under section 245.

Please note that acts so committed/ concluded resulting misconduct are referred under section 241 whereas continual acts are referred in under section 245.

CIRCUMSTANCES / CAUSE OF ACTION Where specified categories of stakeholders forms a common opinion, that the management & conduct of the affairs are being conducted in a manner detrimental to the interests of the Company or stakeholders

The group of people alleges that the defendant is responsible for causing the harm that was suffered by the members of the Class

WHO CAN SUE

The Company  Act, 2013 provides for a minimum number of claimants to institute class section:

As per Sub Section (1) of the Section 245 of the Companies Act, 2013 following can collectively approach Tribunal:

§ Member or Members

§ Depositor or Depositors

§ Any Class of them, as the case may be.

ELIGIBILTY CRITERIA

Until recently, this prescribed numbers of members or depositors required to file a class action suit had not been notified by the government. The government has on May 8, 2019 amended the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 and notified the threshold limits for filing such class action suits under Section 245 of the Act. The notified threshold limits are:

 

 

Sub-Section 3 of Section 245 of the Act as illustrated below sets forth the number of members/depositors required to file a class action suit.

Members

Having Share Capital Not having Share Capital
No. of Required Members minimum 100 members not less than 1/5th of the total number of its members
No. of Required Members 5% of total members
Whichever less
Percentage of shareholding owed In the event of a listed company – 2%

 

In the event of an unlisted company – 5%

 

 –

Depositors

No. of Required Depositors minimum 100 depositors

or

No. of Required depositors 5% of total depositors
Whichever is less
Percentage of deposits owed 5%

WHO CAN BE SUED
  • Company
  • Its Directors
  • An auditor, including audit firm
  • A consultant,
  • Expert
  • Adviser

Individuals as stated Auditor, Consultants, Expert & Adviser can be held separately for their wrong doings alongside the Company and its management by stakeholders by virtue of their powers. Therefore Individuals so associated should act carefully and diligently before advising a company and its management.

HOWEVER in case of Audit firm, Liability is restricted to only those partners in firm, involved in such actions.

Similar provisions under Companies Act, 2013

A separate provision has also been incorporated under SECTION 37 of the Companies Act, 2013 which is too the extent similar to Section 245:

Where affected persons may file suit or any other action may be taken under Section 34 or Section 35 or Section 36, they may be any person or a group of person or association of person. A suit instead of application with NCLT can be filed.

However there is no minimum number of persons required for filing such suit as required under section 245 of the Act,

How to file Class Action Suit………….?

  • An application can be filed in Form NCLT-9 as per rule 84 of NCLT Rules, 2016;
  • A copy of application also needs to be serve to the Company, Regional Director, Registrar of Companies, others respondents and all such persons as the Tribunal may direct;
  • The Tribunal after taking into account the points as mentioned in Section 245(4) and rule 85 of NCLT Rules, 2016, may admit or dismiss the application;
  • Under Oppression & Mismanagement, the Petitioner cannot ask for documents from the Company – Mohta Bros P Ltd. Vs. Calcutta Landing and Shipping Co (1970) 40 Comp. Cas. 119 Cal, so exchange of evidence (documents) is not permitted as permitted in Federal Law.
  • As per sub section (8) of section 245 of the Act Where Application filed before the Tribunal is found to be frivolous (not having serious purpose or value) or vexatious, Tribunal may reject such application & accordingly do so by mentioning the reason in writing and also may direct pay such as costs not exceeding 1 Lakh.
  • In an application following reliefs can be sought:
  • restraining the company from committing an act that is beyond the authority of the articles of association (AoA) or memorandum of association (MoA) of the company,
  • From committing any act contrary to the provisions of the 2013 act or any other applicable law, and declaring a resolution altering the MoA or AoA of the company as void if the resolution was passed by not disclosing material facts or by misstatement to the members or depositors.

These reliefs are akin to preventive reliefs and are based on the principles under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

Section 245 also allows seeking damages or compensation or any other suitable action

  • On admission of application, a public notice shall be issued by the Tribunal in Form NCLT-13 to all the members of the class as per Section 245(5) and rule 87 of NCLT Rules, 2016; within Seven days of admission of application
  • The cost of aforesaid public notice will be borne by applicants and shall be later discharged by company or person so held responsible in case order is passed in favour of applicants.
  • All similar applications pending in any jurisdiction should be consolidated into single application
  • In case any applicant wants to opt-out of the proceedings after the institution of suit, applicant may do so with the permission of Tribunal by filing Form NCLT-1 as per rule 86 of NCLT Rules, 2016;
  • Order so passed by the Tribunal shall be binding on Company and all its members, depositors and auditor including audit firm or expert or consultant or advisor or any other person associated with the company.
  • Penalty on non-compliance of order passed:

Company shall be liable with fine: Rs 5 Lakhs to Rs 25 Lakhs

Other Personnel: Fine: Rs 25000/- to Rs 1 Lakh
Imprisonment: May extend to 3 years terms

(Author-CS Anjali Gorsia, an Associate Member of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India and a Commerce Graduate)

Appreciate your support and so happy to have you as reader.

Author Bio

Qualification: CS
Company: Self Employed
Location: NAGPUR, Maharashtra, IN
Member Since: 14 Jun 2017 | Total Posts: 25
ANJALI JAGDISH GORSIA,(B.COM, ACS), PRACTICING COMPANY SECRETARY FROM NAGPUR. She is Associate Member of The Institute of Company Secretary of India. She is young and energetic having in her profession with a sole thinking of “Asking & sharing increases chances of winning”. Her domain is in View Full Profile

My Published Posts

More Under Income Tax

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts by Date

December 2020
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031