Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Procter & Gamble Home Products Ltd. Vs The Jt. CIT Special Range (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 1997- 98
Sponsored

The assessee had paid a sum of Rs. 2 crores to M/s. Procter & Gamble India Ltd (PGI) towards technical know how fees in assessment year 1994-95. The assessee had amortized the expenditure over a period of six years and claimed deduction of Rs. 33,33,333/- being 1/6th of the payment during the year. AO noted that the assessee was only a trading company and not a manufacturing company and therefore it could not be said to have received any technical know how from PGI and accordingly disallowed the claim.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31