In present facts of the case the Hon’ble High Court relied on the Judgment of M/s Canon India and have observed that Joint/Additional Director (in short “DRI”) is not the ‘proper officer’ to issue show cause notice under Section 28(4) of Customs Act, 1962.
Modern Insecticides Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs and others (Punjab and Haryana High Court) In the present case, it has come on record that the samples with respect to the goods in question have already been taken by the Authorities. Moreover, the petitioner is a 100% export-oriented unit and thus, any difference in the declaration […]
Punjab HC initiated CBI enquiry to fix liability of erring Customs Department and Anti Evasion GST Units in respect of clearing of Consignment without making any entry.
Vineeet Kumar Vs Union of India (Punjab and Haryana High Court) The precise contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that while appearing in response to a notice under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short the CGST Act), Section 116 of the CGST Act permits the […]
Appellant is alleged of having availed Input Tax Credit amounting to Rs.15.44 crores on the basis of invoices issued by such non-existent/fake firms without movement of goods, alleged to have been transported by such fake/non-existent transporters, and on the basis of corresponding transport receipts being included in their record for claiming the said benefit.
Current writ petition has been filed by SpiceJet Limited (Petitioner) to quash the Notice bearing No. 1273, ETO/W-1/GGM (North) dated July 27, 2021 which provided to the Petitioner to discharge its statutory tax dues.
Spicejet Limited Vs Excise And Taxation Officer Cum Proper Officer (Punjab & Haryana High Court) 1. This petition has been filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the notice bearing No. 1273, ETO/W-1/ GGM (North) dated 27.07.2021 (Annexure P1) to discharge its statutory tax dues, or in alternate direct […]
Hema Garg and another Vs State of Haryana and another (Punjab & Haryana High Court) It is submitted that in the instant case, the petitioners are praying for anticipatory bail, in response to the notices issued by the respondents-Department, just in the shape of demand in form GST DRC-01A with an advice to pay the […]
Prime facie, there are serious and specific allegations leveled against the petitioner in the FIR in question for which her custodial interrogation would be imperative, more so, since she allegedly removed crucial documents having a direct link with the proceedings, which were pending against her and her husband under the CGST Act.
Jagadish Nangineni Vs Directorate of Enforcement (Punjab and Haryana High Court) Conclusion: Since ED alleged that both assessees were actively involved in the planning and execution of all the transactions involving repeated transfer of funds and were accused of serious economic offences, therefore, grant of anticipatory bail to assessees at this stage would certainly result […]
