Delve into the notable decision of ITAT Chandigarh in the case of Mahaluxmi Food Industries Vs ITO, concerning the right to set off losses against surrendered business income as per Section 115BBE(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The ITAT Chandigarh ruled in favour of an assessee whose agricultural income was previously marked as income from undisclosed sources, setting a significant precedent.
ITAT Chandigarh held that addition on account of failure to provide necessary explanation in respect of source of cash deposits in bank confirmed without considering explanation set aside with one more opportunity to assessee in the interest of substantial justice and fair play.
ITAT held that income of the assessee which is already taxed in one head cannot be taxed under any other head by the Revenue Department.
ITAT Chandigarh held that invocation of revisionary powers under section 263 post due enquiry carried out by AO and assessment order passed with due application of mind is unjustified and untenable in law
ITAT Chandigarh set aside the addition u/s 69 of the Income Tax Act to the file of AO to test the enforceability of agreement to sell as per relevant statue vis-à-vis fresh affidavit.
ITAT Chandigarh held that disallowance for late deposit of employees’ share of PF/ ESI contribution to relevant funds beyond prescribed due date under respective Act is duly sustainable in law.
ITAT Chandigarh held that late deposit of employees’ share of PF/ ESI contribution to the relevant funds beyond prescribed due date as per respective Act is liable to be disallowed.
ITAT Chandigarh held that exemption under section 54B of the Income Tax Act is not available when property was not purchased in the name of the assessee.
ITAT Chandigarh held that disallowance of expenses u/s 14A read with Rule 8D is unwarranted on the premise that the investment in shares were stock-in-trade.
