Addition under Section 153A could not be made in the absence of incriminating material found during the course of a search conducted under Section 132. In case no incriminating material was unearthed during the search, AO could not reassess taking into consideration the other material in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments.
Learn how the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal restricted the jurisdiction of Section 263 regarding issues not forming part of a limited scrutiny assessment in the case of Aggarwal Promoters Vs PCIT.
ITAT Chandigarh held that reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act based on wrong and irrelevant facts recorded under the reasons recorded for the formation of belief of escapement of income chargeable to income tax is unsustainable in law and liable to be quashed.
ITAT Chandigarh’s ruling on the necessity of proper service for Income Tax notices. An in-depth analysis of Sandeep Kumar vs. ITO case. Learn more.
Analysis of ITAT Chandigarh’s ruling on service of notice in income tax cases, emphasizing the importance of proper notification to taxpayers.
ITAT Chandigarh held that transaction not recorded at the time of survey qualify as unrecorded transactions, however, the assessee has provided the necessary explanation about the nature and source of such unrecorded transactions and hence invoking deeming provisions of section 69-69D of the Income Tax Act unjustified.
ITAT Chandigarh held that transactions which were not recorded at the time of survey are unrecorded transaction, however, as nature and source of such unrecorded transaction explained the same cannot be brought to tax under the deeming provisions of section 69 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Chandigarh held that mere non-accounting of the expired stock as part of the opening stock would not have any impact on the profitability. Accordingly, addition thereof is liable to be deleted.
ITAT Chandigarh rules on treating surrendered income as medical profession income in the case Bharat Vipan Garg Vs PCIT. Dive deep into the judgment details.
Analysis of Pawan Aggarwal’s appeal against CIT(A) Ludhiana order regarding disallowance of expenses and building improvement costs. Outcome by ITAT Chandigarh.
