ITAT Bangalore held that imposition of penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act on account of underreporting of income not justified as failing to furnish income tax return was bona fide.
ITAT Bangalore held that interest/ dividend from co-operative society is eligible for deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act. However, if payer bank is co-operative bank then deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) is not available.
ITAT Bangalore directed AO that claim in respect of interest on fixed deposits if any is not allowed u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act has to be considered in accordance with law by allowing the expenditure u/s. 57 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Bangalore held that as per provisions of section 44AA of the Income Tax Act, an agriculturist is not required to maintain books of accounts. Further, revenue has failed to establish anything contrary, accordingly, addition made on this count deleted.
ITAT Bangalore held that both AO and First Appellate Authority failed to conduct examination of cash deposit during demonetisation period in the light of CBDT instructions and hence matter remanded to that extent.
ITAT Bangalore held that delay of 288 days committed as assessment order mailed to email ID of erstwhile employee and hence delay in filing of an appeal condoned. Matter remanded back to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
ITAT Bangalore held that TCS credit is allowed to the entity conducting the business, irrespective of the fact that the liquor license was in the name of another person. Accordingly, TCS credit allowed.
ITAT Bangalore allows Vyoma Technologies to claim GST late fees and interest as business deductions, ruling them compensatory, not penal, under Section 37(1).
ITAT Bangalore ruled CIT(A)’s rejection of Smt. Prameela Parameshwar’s appeal for non-payment of advance tax invalid, as the addition was based on incorrect information.
In Buhler India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT, the ITAT Bangalore directed the Assessing Officer to verify and grant TDS credit as per the income reflected in Form 26AS.
