Company Law India: Read latest Company law news & updates, acts, circular, notifications & articles issued by MCA amendment in companies Act 2013. Article on Loans Company formation XBRL, Schedule VI IFRS.
Company Law : joint audit involves two or more audit firms working together to issue an audit opinion on the financial statements of an organiza...
Company Law : SC rules that NCLT cannot decide on public law matters under MMDR Act in IBC cases, reaffirming High Court jurisdiction under Arti...
Company Law : Pvt Ltd ROC Filing is a essential compliance requirement for non-public confined groups in India. Filing ROC returns on time facil...
Company Law : Learn the ISIN issuance process, required documents, and compliance steps for dematerializing securities under the Companies Act, ...
Company Law : Understand purpose, filing requirements, due dates and penalties of Form MSME-1 for companies with outstanding dues to MSME suppli...
Company Law : Find the provisional list of audit firms of listed companies that haven't filed NFRA-2 forms for the reporting period 2023-24. Upd...
Company Law : The Companies Act 2013 mandates corporate governance, transparency, and CSR reporting. Key provisions include financial disclosure...
Company Law : Understand the compliance regime for private limited companies in India, including business closure timelines and government measu...
Company Law : Overview of proposed amendments in the Companies Act, 2013, CSR monitoring framework, and steps to ensure compliance and prevent m...
Company Law : Review CSR activities as mandated under Section 135 of the Companies Act, including sector-wise and state-wise CSR expenditure fro...
Company Law : When the corporate debtor failed to pay the outstanding power obligation, appellant subsequently cut off the electrical service. O...
Company Law : The plain reading of the above provisions of Section 60(5)(c) clearly indicates that the NCLT is empowered to adjudicate any quest...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi quashes CIRP against Alcuris Healthcare, ruling profit-sharing disputes do not constitute operational debt under IBC. ...
Company Law : NCLAT dismisses appeals in Saturn Ventures case, upholding RP’s findings on asset ownership and rejecting fraudulent transaction...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi held that Liquidator is jurisdictionally empowered to proceed with private sale of Corporate Debtor by adopting Swiss ...
Company Law : Vishnupriya Hotels' appeal led to a penalty reduction for non-compliance with Section 149(3) of the Companies Act. The company pai...
Company Law : Vishnupriya Hotels appealed against CSR non-compliance penalties. The Regional Director reduced the fine after reviewing submissio...
Company Law : Konoria Plaschem faced penalties for failing to appoint an internal auditor from 2014-2020. The fine was reduced on appeal. Read t...
Company Law : Water & Sanitation (India) for Urban Poor failed to hold board meetings from 2011-2019, leading to penalties. The fine was later r...
Company Law : Tristar Transport India Pvt. Ltd. fined for delays in filing BEN-1 and BEN-2 under Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013. Director...
Union Minister for Corporate Affairs Shri Murli Deora has desired that concerted action to be taken to expedite the process of liquidation of companies which is currently taking inordinately long. In the conference of Official Liquidators organised by the Ministry recently to discuss ways for expediting liquidation process the it was opined that one of the major factors responsible for India’s low rank in the global “doing business survey” conducted by the World Bank is the time taken for liquidation of companies.
Corrigendum to Circular no. 09/2011 dated 31.03.2011 In the said circular for clauses (i) and (ii) of paragraph 2 under the Heading Coverage in Phase I, the following shall be substituted and read as : (i) All companies listed in India and their subsidiaries, having paid up capital of Rs. 5 Crore and above or a turnover of Rs. 100 crore or above, excluding banking companies, insurance companies, power companies, Non Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) and overseas subsidiaries of these companies.
In order to ensure compliance of the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and Rules made thereunder, it is observed that the majority companies are only filing their event based information through MCA-21 to the Registrar of Companies, however the statutory compliance related to Annual filings are not complied with. Therefore, it has been decided that the companies who have not filed their statutory Annual Reports (i.e. Balance Sheets, Profit and Loss Accounts and Annual Reports) with the Registrar of Companies, they should not to be allowed to file their other Forms except the following Forms till the companies has filed its updated Statutory Annual Accounts/ Annual Report in MCA-21 system:-
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of……………….(name of the Company), as at 31st March, 2XXX and also the Profit and Loss Account for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
It has come to the notice of the Ministry that some companies are making applications for getting prior approval of Central Government when they propose to make any loan to, or give any guarantee or provide any security in connection with a loan made by any other person to a Public Limited Company of which any such Director is a Director or a member even when the proposal does not fall under Section 295(d) and Section 295(e) of the Companies Act, 1956. General Circular No. 24/2011, Dated: – 12th May, 2011
These rules may be called the Companies (Accounting Standards) Amendment Rules, 2011. They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette. In the said rules, in the annexure under the heading B. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS, in the sub-heading “Accounting Standard (AS) 11” relating to The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates, in paragraph 46, for the words and figures “46. In respect of accounting periods commencing on or after 7th December, 2006 and ending on or before 31s` March 2011”, the following shall be substituted, namely,‑ 46. In respect of accounting periods commencing on or after 7th December, 2006 and ending on or before 31′ March 2012.
FAQ’s on Appointment of Cost Auditor and Draft of letters as required to be submitted by Cost Auditor in terms of MCA Circular. Q.1 Has the Government prescribed a new procedure for appointment of cost auditor by the companies? Ans. Yes. The procedure has been modified by the Cost Audit Branch of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide General Circular No. 15/2011 dated 11th April 2011. The circular shall be effective from the financial year commencing on or after the 1st day of April, 2011.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1),(2),(5) and (8) of section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), the Central Government hereby makes the following regulations further to amend the Companies Regulations, 1956, namely:- 1. (1) These regulations may be called the Companies (Amendment) Regulations, 2011.(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.2. In the Companies Regulations, 1956 (herein after referred to as the said regulations), in Part B, in regulation 3, 5, 7, 9 and 14, for the word “Regional Director”, the word “Registrar of Companies” shall be substituted.
The new company law will make it mandatory for companies to disclose details of social sector initiatives, called CSR, in addition to money spent, to shareholders in their annual reports. Not just how much, but companies will also have to disclose to their shareholders where they have spent the 2 per cent of net profit earmarked for corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, once the Companies Bill 2009 is passed by Parliament.
S.E. Investment Limited (the Petitioner) was incorporated with an authorized share capital of INR 2 million which was gradually increased to INR 85 million.The Petitioner had paid stamp duty on the increase in the authorized share capital from INR 2 million to INR 85 million.The Petitioner further increased its authorized shares capital from INR 85 million to INR 1250 million and filed Form No. 5 with Registrar of Companies (RoC). The ROC insisted on payment of Stamp duty.The Petitioner sought clarification from the Collector of Stamps, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Stamp duty authority) as to whether any additional stamp duty on increase in authorized share capital was payable in accordance with Article 10 of the Schedule IA of the Indian Stamp (Delhi Amendment) Act, 2007 (Delhi Stamp Act). In response to the application the Petitioner was directed by the Stamp duty authority to pay the stamp duty of INR 1.87 million on increased authorized shares capital of INR 1165 million.The Petitioner filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court.
