Allahabad High Court held that cancellation of GST registration without following condition prescribed under Rule 21 of GST Rules merely on the bass of reflection of HSN/SAC Code in registration application is not sustainable.
Karnataka High Court held that statutory upper limit of maximum stamp duty INR 25 crores under the Karnataka Stamp (Second Amendment) Act, 2022 is not applicable to the additional duty levied under section 3B the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957.
NCLAT Delhi held that application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] is not maintainable due to pre-existing dispute between the parties. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
ITAT Chandigarh held that amount in locker being cash received on sale of flat which is already assessed to capital gain. Accordingly, addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained cash rightly deleted by CIT(A). Thus, appeal of revenue dismissed.
ITAT Raipur held that providing unreasonably short period of time of six days for furnishing reply vide notice issued u/s. 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act is against the mandate of law and hence liable to be set aside.
Kerala High Court held that owners of buildings are liable to pay the annual property tax demanded in the respective demand notices at the revised rates from a period three years prior to the date of demand, after deducting the property tax already paid.
Supreme Court held that resolution plan by Successful Resolution Application i.e. Piramal Capital and Housing Limited for Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd [DHFL] stands approved. Accordingly, appeal filed by assessee dismissed.
Patna High Court held that compounding charge should be deposited by the petitioner abiding his statement and issue of apportionment of compounding charges should be considered by the Secretary, Rural Works Department.
ITAT Delhi held that while computing total income as per Rule 5 r.w. section 44, provisions of section 14A are not applicable. Further, disallowance method of computation of prescribed under Rule 8D is not applicable while “Book Profit” u/s 115JB.
NCLAT Delhi held that initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) for failure to honour repayment obligation justified since application filed within limitation period. Accordingly, present appeal dismissed.
