The Tribunal held that since the Assessing Officer made no addition after verifying disclosures, the grievance lacked merit. Grounds were rightly treated as infructuous due to absence of tax impact.
Accounts with no contributions for four consecutive quarters will be classified as dormant and charged reduced AMC. This lower fee continues until the account becomes active again.
The issue is whether foreign businesses without offices in China must comply with tax laws. The key takeaway is that activities and income sources can trigger CIT obligations even without physical presence.
The issue was whether reassessment notice issued after six years was valid. The Court upheld that such notices are time-barred and cannot be sustained under law.
The Court examined whether reassessment notice issued beyond limitation was valid. It held that notices issued after expiry of the six-year limit under the old regime are barred and liable to be set aside.
The case examined whether a tube-fed nutritional liquid qualifies as a beverage. Authorities held that its clinical use and lack of consumption as a drink exclude it from beverage classification.
The issue highlights illegal confiscation of goods under Section 130 without evidence of tax evasion. The key takeaway is that penal provisions cannot be invoked without proving intent to evade tax.
The procedure outlines steps for altering the Memorandum of Association, including board approval, shareholder resolution, and regulatory filings. It emphasizes that changes become effective only after Registrar or government approval.
The Court held that reassessment under Sections 147/148 cannot be initiated solely on third-party data without independent evidence of income escapement. It ruled that such reopening amounts to suspicion and lacks the required “reason to believe.”
The Tribunal upheld disallowance of deduction where donations were routed back to donors through layered transactions. The key takeaway is that non-genuine donations do not qualify for tax deduction.
