Income Tax : Understand whether director remuneration is taxed as salary or business income. Learn about tax implications, employer-employee re...
CA, CS, CMA : Stay compliant with key September 2024 deadlines for GST, Income Tax, and ROC filings. Avoid penalties with this essential due dat...
Income Tax : Explore allowable tax deductions for AY 2025-26, covering salaries, house property, business, and personal expenses. Maximize your...
Income Tax : Understand key reporting requirements for Tax Audit Reports under Sections 44AA and 44AB, including forms, clauses, and disclosure...
Income Tax : Learn about tax audit under Section 44AB, including objectives, requirements, forms, and penalties for non-compliance....
Income Tax : Chamber of Tax Consultants seeks an extension for filing Form 10B and Form 10BB while requesting relaxation of requirements. Detai...
Income Tax : Explore the latest 2023 revision of the ICAI's Guidance Note on Tax Audit under Section 44AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Learn ab...
Income Tax : Members may to raise any issues related to Tax Audit where elucidation, clarification or further elucidation is desired at email i...
CA, CS, CMA : Representation to CBDT on information sought from Tax Auditors under Clause 44 of Form 3CD and request to abolish this requirement...
Income Tax : Representation requesting to scrap Clause No. 44 of Tax Audit Report (Form 3CD) under the Income Tax Act, 1961...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur held that passing of order by CIT(A) without considering adjournment request of the assessee is not justifiable in law...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court rules write-back of provisions isn't 'turnover' or 'gross receipts' under Sec 44AB, quashing tax return invali...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court directs tax revision for an AI-generated invalid return order lacking reasoning, stressing natural justice and h...
Income Tax : Held that the invoices issued by the assessee contained a barcode. A barcode on a tax invoice serves as a verification mechanism, ...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur held that addition of the amount already recorded as cash sales cannot be treated as unexplained cash deposits under s...
Income Tax : CBDT extends the due date for filing Form 56F under Section 10AA(8) and 10A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to March 31, 2025, for...
Income Tax : Stay updated with CBDT's Form 3CD Tax Audit Report Format, Form 3CEB & Form No. 65 revision. Learn about changes in tax audit rep...
Income Tax : Read Circular 18/2023 from the Government of India Ministry of Finance. Learn about the extension of the filing deadline for Incom...
Income Tax : CBDT has vide Notification No. 28/2021-Income Tax inserted new clauses in Form 3CD (Tax Audit Report) and also notified that Tax A...
Income Tax : The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) deferred the Tax Audit Clause 30C and 44 till 31st Mar 2022 due to COVID-19. F.No. 3701...
Deduction under section 80IA(4) couldn’t be denied solely due to the delayed filing of Form 10CCB, as the audit report was filed before the return was processed.
ITAT Chennai held that Form 56F not signed by an accountant, as referred in section 10A(5) of the Income Tax Act, is defective and hence deduction under section 10A of the Income Tax Act not admissible. Accordingly, appeal of revenue allowed.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition towards bogus purchases unwarranted as GP rate on sale of alleged bogus purchases is more than the GP rate of other purchases. Accordingly, appeal allowed the addition deleted.
ITAT Agra held that ex-parte dismissal of appeal, as notices issued by CIT(A) were not compiled, without adjudicating issues on merits is in violation of section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act. Hence, order set aside and matter remitted back to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
ITAT Jaipur held that when the cash found in books are more then physically found no further addition is required to be made in the hands of the assessee. Accordingly, addition towards unexplained cash set aside.
Filing of Form 10CCB required for claiming deductions under Section 80IA before the due date for filing of return of income u/s 139(1) was only directory and not mandatory for the year under consideration.
Assessee has not violated the provision of the Act u/s 271B as the assessee has Audited his accounts as per the provisions of section 44AB within the stipulated time but only filed the same belatedly.
Kerala High Court held that penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act, for non-compliance with provisions of section 44AB, not imposable since reasonable cause for belated filing of audit report established.
As a result, assessee was required to deduct TDS on payments made to Bemo. AO invoked Section 40(a)(i) for non-deduction of tax on Rs. 12,69,79,006, disallowing the deduction.
ITAT Mumbai held that interest paid on loan from group entities are in the nature of reimbursement and therefore not liable for deduction of TDS. Therefore, addition made by AO is directed to be deleted.
