Income Tax : Budget 2025 revises block assessment rules for search cases, covering undisclosed income, assessment procedures, penalties, and ti...
Income Tax : Explore reintroduction of block assessments under Income Tax Act via Finance Act 2024, its implications, challenges, and way forwa...
Income Tax : Understand the compounding of offences under the Income-tax Act, 1961, including categories, charges, and procedures as per the Fi...
Income Tax : Learn about prosecution under IT Act sections 275A to 280, including penalties and conditions for launching prosecution....
Income Tax : Learn about the compounding of offences under direct tax laws, including eligible offences, competent authorities, and the process...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court held that approval accorded in terms of section 153D of the Income Tax Act in a mechanical manner without applica...
Income Tax : Allahabad High Court dismisses the Revenue's appeal in PCIT Vs Subodh Agarwal, citing mechanical approval under Section 153D of th...
Income Tax : A search and seizure action u/s.132 of the Act was conducted in the assessee's case on 14.11.2019. AO observed that during the cou...
Income Tax : ITAT Patna held that addition towards unexplained income upheld since assessee failed to prove genuineness of transaction and cred...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that addition based on documents seized from third party is liable to be set aside since assessing officer failed ...
Income Tax : Availability of Miscellaneous Functionalities related to ‘Selection of Case of Search Year’ and ‘Relevant Search...
Delhi High Court held that income tax authorities cannot retain seized cash once time period for framing an assessment under section 153A of the Income Tax Act has expired and there is no outstanding demand. Accordingly, petition disposed of.
ITAT Delhi held that merely seizure of share certificate cannot be considered as incriminating material on its own unless other corroborative evidence are found during the search. Accordingly, appeal of the department dismissed.
ITAT Delhi deletes Rs. 13.16 lakh addition in Aashiyana Civil Contractors P. Ltd. case for AY 2011-12, citing lack of incriminating material in unabated assessment.
ITAT Mumbai held that in the matter of adjustment of seized cash against self-assessment tax liability restored the matter back to file of AO for re-verification of application filed by the assessee. Accordingly, appeal partly allowed.
Delhi High Court held that uploading of information by the investigation wing of the Income Tax department would not be a substitute for recording of a satisfaction note by the AO of searched person for handing over material to AO of person other than searched person.
ITAT Delhi held that revisionary proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act would not survive since the assessment order is held to be non-est. Thus, appeal dismissed as having become infructuous.
ITAT Jaipur examines Harish Jain’s appeal regarding additions on undisclosed income and retraction of statements during search operations. Detailed case analysis.
‘Gupt Daan’,a secret gift regarding unexplained cash in a Religious Trust locker was pertaining to RNB Temple Trust and was already brought on record to the extent of Rs.1,79,00,000/- which was evident from the Balance Sheet submitted.
ITAT Mumbai held that notice for re-assessment proceeding under section 148 of the Income Tax Act issued on a non-existing entity i.e. merged entity is void ab initio and hence is liable to be quashed.
Among the documents seized contained information pertaining to the Assessee and AO recorded his satisfaction that those documents have bearing on the determination of total income of the Assessee.
