Income Tax : Explore the intricacies of gold taxation in India, covering physical gold, paper gold, gold derivatives, inheritance tax, and comp...
Income Tax : Unlock the intricacies of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, unraveling the nuances of unexplained cash credits. Delve into its ame...
Income Tax : Explore the implications of taxation under section 115BBE, including misuse of sections 68 to 69D, consequences of high tax rates,...
Income Tax : Merely because certain cash was deposited in the specified bank notes by the assessee during the demonetization period will not ma...
Income Tax : Discover the ITAT Chennai verdict on Santhilal Jain Vijay Kumar Vs ITO, addressing taxation on excess stock and unexplained marria...
Income Tax : If AO adopts a plausible view, even if two views are possible, the assessment cannot be deemed erroneous merely because the PCIT h...
Income Tax : Understand Parmod Singla Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh) case on excess stock surrendered during survey and its tax implications under ...
Income Tax : Read the detailed analysis of the ITAT Chandigarh verdict on DDK Spinning Mills vs DCIT, focusing on the implications of Section 6...
Bangalore ITAT’s ruling on cash deposits during demonetization raises questions on verification methods. Learn about the case between ITO and Shri Chatrapati Shivaji.
ITAT Chandigarh held that addition invoking the deeming provisions of section 69 r.w.s. 115BBE of the Income Tax Act unjustified as nature and source of undisclosed income/ investment duly explained by the assessee.
New Delhi ITAT rules that no addition can be made under Sec 69 if the difference in stock found during survey and recorded in books is reconciled. Detailed analysis of Ultimate Creations Vs ACIT.
In Bharat Agro Industries Vs DCIT, New Delhi ITAT questions the logic of treating sales as bogus when purchases are genuine and stock is accepted.
Once an appeal is lodged with CIT(A), the PCIT’s authority to revise assessment under Section 263 is circumscribed – Kathiravan Ananthalakshmi Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)
ITAT Hyderabad orders fresh examination of Bollam Sampath Kumar Jewellers’ cash deposits and sales during demonetization, highlighting the importance of documentation.
In the landmark Mudhol Pattina Sahakari Sangh Niyamita vs. ACIT case, ITAT Bangalore held additions under Section 68 need examination of cash deposit source.
Ahmedabad ITAT allows Amikrupa Education Trust’s appeal, ruling cash deposits during demonetization with explained sources not taxable under Section 69A.
ITAT Bangalore rules in favor of Minority Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. on interest income deduction under section 80P(2)(d) from unlicensed co-op bank investments for AY 2017-18.
Explore the ITAT Rajkot’s detailed analysis of Vaidya Realities vs PCIT case under Section 263, highlighting the AO’s assessment, PCIT’s concerns, and the final verdict.
