Case Law Details
Case Name : SMV Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
it is undisputed that the main appellant is a bottler of Pepsi brand of aerated waters and is purchasing concentrate from PFL and converting into aerated waters sells the same to various distributors, PFL discharges central excise duty on the concentrate so sold to the main appellant; the manufacturing activity of aerated waters is diluting the concentrate purchased from PFL; the main appellant is also engaged in the trading activity of various canned products of Pepsi brand which are purchased by them from Pepsico India Holdings Ltd. which is not the same as P
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.