This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CESTAT allows CENVAT Credits to Appellant for input services availed by branch office
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Desai and Diwanji Vs Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Desai and Diwanji Vs Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Mumbai)
It was held in that decision that in the event of centralised billing and centralised accounting system, when one registration is permissible under Section 4(2), discharging Service Tax liability from the registered premises would not disentitled the benefits of CENVAT Credit on the Service Tax paid by the service provider if invoices are raised in the name of Branch offices, even if the said Branch offices are unregistered one since Service Tax liability has been discharged by the main office also for service provided by the Branches. ...
