Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of CGST & Cental Excise Vs Oerlikon Balzars Coating India Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Commissioner of CGST & Cental Excise Vs Oerlikon Balzars Coating India Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Mumbai)

Rule 7 was amended with effect from 01.04.2016 making pro tata distinction mandatory; during the period in question; there was no such restriction

We share the recent order passed by the Hon’ble CESTAT Mumbai. The assessee is engaged in providing coating services. It has registered office at Pune. The said coating services are providing from various units located across the country. It has an agreement with the foreign principal for receipt of technical know how etc. On

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031