Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Co-op society providing credit facilities to members is entitled to Section 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2024 taxguru.in 3032
Case Name
Kotekar Vyavasaya Seva Sahakara Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement

Kotekar Vyavasaya Seva Sahakara Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)

In the case of Kotekar Vyavasaya Seva Sahakara vs. ACIT (ITAT Bangalore), the issue revolved around the applicability of Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, which provides deductions for income earned by cooperative societies providing credit facilities to their members. The dispute arose from the denial of this deduction by the Assessing Officer (AO), which was subsequently upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)].

Background and Facts

Kotekar Vyavasaya Seva Sahakara (the assessee) is an agricultural credit cooperative society engaged in accepting deposits from its members and providing loans to them. For the assessment year 2017-18, the assessee declared a total income of Rs. 17,22,190/-, claiming a deduction of Rs. 1,23,57,259/- under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act. The AO, however, disallowed this deduction primarily on grounds related to the principle of mutuality, alleging that the society did not maintain mutual rights and obligations uniformly among all its members.

Proceedings Before the Authorities

  1. Assessing Officer (AO): During scrutiny, the AO focused on the income earned by the society from deposits made in cooperative banks, which totaled Rs. 3,50,17,502/-. The AO contended that this income did not qualify for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) as it was treated as operational income by the assessee.
  2. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)): Upheld the AO’s decision, emphasizing that the society’s differentiation between ordinary and nominal members violated cooperative society principles. CIT(A) relied on judicial precedents such as the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens Cooperative Society case and held that the society did not adhere to the principle of mutuality required under Section 80P.

Arguments Before the ITAT Bangalore

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 21,146

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.