Case Law Details
ITO Vs Rajeev Sareen Indore (ITAT Indore)
1. The assessee had made huge cash deposits in different bank accounts.
2. During assessment-proceeding, the assessee claimed that the cash-deposits were made out of the opening cash-balance available with him.
3. Ld. AO perused the return of income of the immediately preceding year held by department on record and observed that the assessee had declared “Nil” cash balance as on 31st march of preceding year in the return.
4. When this fact was confronted to the assessee, it was submitted by him that the reporting of “Nil” cash balance was just a reporting- error, but the assessee was factually having cash-balance as claimed by him during the assessment.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
