This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Responsibility of CIT(A) to adjudicate on merits even If no submission was made
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Chandigarh Overseas Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chandigarh
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Chandigarh Overseas Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Conclusion: Even if the assessee was unrepresented, CIT(A) should have adjudicated the issues before him based on the case record before him but unfortunately, CIT(A) chose not to do so and dismissed the assessee’s appeal without examining the case on merits. Therefore, the condonation of delay was allowable and substantial justice required that the issues should be re-examined by CIT(A).
Held: The main issue for consideration was the issue of condonation of delay of 1385 days. Assessee has filed an application praying for condonation ...




