Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ABB Limited Vs Additional CIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : ITA No.440/Bang/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/03/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2006-2007
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ABB Limited Vs Additional CIT (ITAT Bangalore)

Learned AR has given a table, wherein it is claimed that excess payment of advance tax for the 1st and the last quarter has been ignored while calculating interest u/s 234C of the I.T. Act.

ITAT directs A.O. to exam

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. vswami says:

    “5.1 The A.O. is directed to examine the correctness of the claim of the assessee as regards the calculation of interest u/s 234C of the I.T.Act and grant relief in accordance with law. Accordingly, ground 2 in additional ground is restored to the A.O.”
    As stated, -“The relevant assessment year is 2006-2007.’
    It stands to be inferred from thetext of the itat order, presumably . the assessment has been completed manually; not processed though the CPC.
    Be that as it may, am personally aware of an instance in which, even while e’filing a tax return for AY 2021-22,the filer has substantially over paid advance tax and as per the computation in the return a refund is due(together with interest); nonetheless, the system calculates and shows interest u/s 234C as due. Does that not mean that the system itself is faulty; if so, requires to be revamped ?!?
    courtesy

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031