Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Senthil Murugan Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Senthil Murugan Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)

ITAT Chennai held that there is no material on record that assessee has sought for advice of CA. Affidavit filed by the C.A., stating that assessee was advised not to file an appeal, is nothing but an afterthought. Accordingly, condonation of delay not granted.

Facts- The appeal filed by the assessee is time barred by 449 days delay in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. In the form of an affidavit, the assessee has filed petition for condo

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31