Section 43B is of no consequence to judge applicability of section 36(1)(va)

Infobells Interactive Solutions Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)

Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Essae Teraoka [P] Ltd., Vs. DCIT, reported in [2014] 366 ITR 408 [Kar] has considered the concept of ‘due date’ as appearing in 36[1][va] and section 43B of the Act and has taken the view that the assessee is entitled to the relief having regard to the use of the expression “contribution” under the Provident Fund Act. Now it has been provided that the due date in section 43B is of no

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.