Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sri.Yash Vardhan Arya Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-2017
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sri.Yash Vardhan Arya Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Conclusion: Since assessee had not brought on record any documentary evidence to show that it had incurred interest expenditure as against the income assessed under the head `income from other sources. Therefore, the addition sustained by the CIT(A) to the extent of Rs.1,83,003 was confirmed. Held: Assessee had earned dividend income of Rs. 62,905/- and interest on PPF of Rs 11,059/- and claimed as exempt. He had also offered negative income of Rs. 96,208/- under head income from other sources after claiming deduction of Rs. 2,89,211/- as interest ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930