Case Law Details
Aathi Hotel Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) (Madras High Court)
No interest and penalty to be imposed if credit is merely availed but not utilised | Section 73 & 74 Interest will be attracted only if wrong/excess ITC availed & utilized
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in Aathi Hotel v. Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) [W.P.No.3474 of 2021 W.M.P.Nos.3980 & 3982 of 2021 dated December 08, 2021] has held that, the interest is to be attracted only where credit is not only availed but also utilised for discharging tax liabilities and if there is an attempt to wrongly avail the credit and utilise the same then the tax liability would arise.
Facts:
M/s. Aathi Hotel (“the Petitioner”) is an hotelier and had purchased certain capital goods in connection with the business. The Petitioner had filed Form GST TRAN-1 and claimed a transitional credit i.e. Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) of INR 3,86,271, of VAT paid on capital goods purchased for hotel business, with a view to set off future tax liability of its furniture business, which was actually not available to the Petitioner. The transitional credit availed by the Petitioner was never utilized.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
sir like your guide if Cenvat credit could,t be filed but credited and avialed in GSTR-3 B.after SC Jud. reversed .can GST ask for interest for the period from 1.7.2017.where as CENVAT IS ENETILEMENT FROM ACCRUAL Date 1.7.2017.
m 9999001345
IGST tax wrongly availed CGST AND SGST, Next year 3B revised ITC CSGT AND SGST then claim IGST interest applicable section 50(1)
Very nicely written 👍👍