Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Cubex Tubings Limited Vs The Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 30543 of 2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/05/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Cubex Tubings Limited Vs The Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)

In the present case, section 35F of the Excise Act, as it stood prior to 06.08.2014, provides for payment of interest only if the pre-deposit amount is not refunded within a period three months from the date of communication of the order to adjudicating authority.

Facts-

The appellant had sought refund of an amount of Rs. 32 lakhs and Rs. 84 lakhs deposited by the appellant in the two appeals filed before the Tribunal towards the pre-deposit amount required to be deposited under section 35F of the Excise Act as the appeals were ultimately allowed by the Tribunal by order dated 28.02.2019. The Deputy Commissioner directed for refund of the pre-deposit amount, but rejected the claim for interest for the reason that section 35F of the Excise Act, as it stood prior to 06.08.2014, would be applicable and not the amended provisions. The Deputy Commissioner found, as a fact in both the matters, that the refund had been sanctioned within three months from the date it was claimed and, therefore, interest would not be payable. The appeals filed by the appellant before the Commissioner (Appeals) were also rejected for this reason.

Conclusion-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031